[..] net.mail.headers

Oldest | Popular

Bitnet Addresses (1 reply, 10/27/83)

the csnet btl address (2 replies, 12/05/83)

Funny headers from LBL-CSAM (0 replies, 01/23/84)

What time zone is Alaska in? (1 reply, 01/26/84)

From Where ? (0 replies, 01/31/84)

UTC Time stamping (4 replies, 02/02/84)

UTC time stamping & time zone designators (1 reply, 02/02/84)

Sender's time zone (2 replies, 02/04/84)

GMT vs UCT (1 reply, 02/05/84)

Several questions/comments on time zones (11 replies, 02/07/84)

Return path and small machines (0 replies, 02/15/84)

return path etc. (0 replies, 02/15/84)

manifesto (0 replies, 02/15/84)

Addressing in international environments (0 replies, 02/17/84)

Correction to preceding news (2 replies, 02/17/84)

Is someone trying to prove a point? (2 replies, 02/17/84)

glop. (0 replies, 02/17/84)

Paths vs. Domains (0 replies, 02/18/84)

bizarre letter (0 replies, 02/18/84)

It's coming. (0 replies, 02/18/84)

Swedish mail loop? (0 replies, 02/18/84)

PCP proposal (1 reply, 02/18/84)

COM versus Case Sensitivity (0 replies, 02/18/84)

Overloading the UUCP network. (1 reply, 02/18/84)

my note on MCI mail (2 replies, 02/20/84)

More spacewarp from York (0 replies, 02/20/84)

security of envelopes (0 replies, 02/20/84)

PC UUCP (0 replies, 02/21/84)

Strange Message (1 reply, 02/22/84)

"Unable to deliver after 0 days" (0 replies, 02/22/84)

another bitnet question (0 replies, 02/22/84)

PC node names (0 replies, 02/23/84)

"Return-Path" vs. "From" (15 replies, 02/23/84)

Domains, PTTs, Lauren's PC/UUCP, and the WorldNet (0 replies, 02/24/84)

envelopes versus messages (0 replies, 02/25/84)

"From " vs. "From:" in Sendmail (5 replies, 02/29/84)

User selectable mailboxes (2 replies, 02/29/84)

envelope information (7 replies, 03/01/84)

$1/message (4 replies, 03/02/84)

RESENT field :-<:) (0 replies, 03/02/84)

RESENT field :) (2 replies, 03/02/84)

dead hosts ? (2 replies, 03/02/84)

CBMS 84 (0 replies, 03/05/84)

"MAIL FROM:<>" in SMTP (0 replies, 03/05/84)

smtp, errors and delivery and authentication (0 replies, 03/07/84)

Mailing lists that "take responsability" (1 reply, 03/07/84)

smtp, errors, and delivery (1 reply, 03/07/84)

return-path (1 reply, 03/07/84)

addressing follies (1 reply, 03/07/84)

Not about SMTP and authentication (1 reply, 03/07/84)

smtp, errors and delivery (14 replies, 03/08/84)

How do I get a copy of RFC 822, etc. (0 replies, 03/09/84)

SMTP and authentication (6 replies, 03/09/84)

Strange From headers (4 replies, 03/12/84)

Bogus "Arpanet hosts" (2 replies, 03/12/84)

Authentication (2 replies, 03/13/84)

Fix for ".ARPA" hard-coded in sendmail source (0 replies, 03/14/84)

Goodbye (1 reply, 03/14/84)

.ARPA is coming (0 replies, 03/17/84)

Rochester SMTP server complaint (0 replies, 03/19/84)

.ARPA hard coded into sendmail/src/daemon.c (4 replies, 03/20/84)

dhosts.txt (0 replies, 03/20/84)

Anybody know what provoked THIS? (0 replies, 03/21/84)

ack's.. (0 replies, 03/21/84)

that amazing ack (0 replies, 03/21/84)

That ferocious ack (1 reply, 03/21/84)

name@XEROX (0 replies, 04/06/84)

losing header munging at udel relay (3 replies, 04/11/84)

What DEC domain? (2 replies, 04/14/84)

Friday the 13th (1 reply, 04/14/84)

More on RHEA.DEC (1 reply, 04/17/84)

observation (3 replies, 04/18/84)

Slight problem at mddc? (1 reply, 04/22/84)

arcane sendmail configuration tables (1 reply, 04/22/84)

RFC821/822 updates/extensions (0 replies, 04/28/84)

Malformed headers (9 replies, 05/02/84)

bogus headers (0 replies, 05/03/84)

UUCP style From lines (0 replies, 05/05/84)

domains other than ARPA (0 replies, 05/06/84)

routing *TO* ARPA.NET (0 replies, 05/11/84)

BATCH SMTP ? (1 reply, 05/12/84)

REF: SVENTEK@LBL-WS.ARPA "RFC822 clarification" (0 replies, 05/15/84)

RFC822 clarification (1 reply, 05/16/84)

Batch SMTP (1 reply, 05/16/84)

what to do with (2 replies, 05/19/84)

new BITNET site (0 replies, 05/20/84)

Addressing people across networks (0 replies, 05/23/84)

SMTP for IBM VM (0 replies, 05/30/84)

Date: field in UUCP mail (0 replies, 06/02/84)

multiple senders ? (0 replies, 06/05/84)

Date format survey. (0 replies, 06/07/84)

SMTP "MAIL FROM:" (1 reply, 06/14/84)

double home address in From: line (0 replies, 06/30/84)

RFC 822 history (0 replies, 07/09/84)

"blaming Unix SendMail" (20 replies, 07/10/84)

I am going on vacation (0 replies, 07/13/84)

internetwork addressing questions, with sendmail.cf fix (1 reply, 07/19/84)

embedded spaces in mail addresses (0 replies, 08/01/84)

internetwork addressing questions (4 replies, 08/02/84)

Bitnet Question (0 replies, 08/03/84)

RFC822 parser (0 replies, 08/07/84)

Sendmail problem: UUCP headers (1 reply, 08/11/84)

RFC822 parser needed (0 replies, 08/21/84)

parsing headers (1 reply, 08/21/84)

Editing Headers (0 replies, 08/22/84)

user-editable headers (1 reply, 08/22/84)

editing the from field (0 replies, 08/24/84)

edited header fields (0 replies, 08/24/84)

Going overboard on mail headers discussion (0 replies, 08/30/84)

Sender versus the envelope (0 replies, 08/30/84)

Date-string parser posted to "net.sources" (0 replies, 09/02/84)

"bare CR" and "bare LF" in RFC822 headers (2 replies, 09/04/84)

Illegality in from fields (0 replies, 09/16/84)

Thanks for distribution list info (0 replies, 09/17/84)

MCI Mail (0 replies, 09/18/84)

Name data base or Name and Host data base (1 reply, 09/19/84)

What are SMTP commands "EXPN" and "VRFY" good for? (7 replies, 09/21/84)

illegality (8 replies, 09/21/84)

user-editable mail headers (28 replies, 09/25/84)

Virtual Terminal Protocol (2 replies, 10/19/84)

mail address parsing forwarded from net.mail (0 replies, 10/24/84)

Domain Specification (0 replies, 10/25/84)

domain servers (0 replies, 10/31/84)

Interesting bug (0 replies, 11/01/84)

mail address parsing (0 replies, 11/09/84)

The "From" field (0 replies, 11/14/84)

Wrong From and Path line in fa.* newsgroups (0 replies, 11/21/84)

long names (0 replies, 12/05/84)

MRC's 1500 business cards (0 replies, 12/18/84)

Body line length (2 replies, 01/08/85)

What Domain For Me ? (0 replies, 01/09/85)

bug in Berkeley (0 replies, 01/09/85)

The MODEM communications package. (0 replies, 01/25/85)

Question on Probability of Keyboard Error (0 replies, 02/05/85)

Sendmail-like entity on System V? (0 replies, 02/06/85)

Please add me to the list (0 replies, 02/08/85)

problem with WISCVM gateway (2 replies, 02/10/85)

DATE STAMPING (0 replies, 02/11/85)

Message Encapsulation (1 reply, 02/12/85)

Forwarded mail from Kenneth Sloan <sloan@uw-tanga.arpa> (0 replies, 02/12/85)

nicknames not allowed in headers (0 replies, 02/13/85)

lowercase host names (6 replies, 02/16/85)

DOMAINS and lower case addressing (3 replies, 02/21/85)

Firewalls etc. (0 replies, 02/21/85)

In-Reply-To:<19Feb85.120510.EN0C@CMU-CS-A.ARPA> (0 replies, 02/21/85)

RFC 934 - Message Encapsulation (8 replies, 02/21/85)

capitalization (6 replies, 02/26/85)

Firewalls in sendmail (7 replies, 02/28/85)

TCP/IP: How to make it go ? (0 replies, 03/21/85)

Checksum as a replacement for missing Message-ID. (9 replies, 04/09/85)

SMTP for WANG ??? (0 replies, 04/13/85)

those colons again (1 reply, 04/22/85)

strange domains (0 replies, 05/22/85)

AMES-VMSB and \".decnet\" domain (2 replies, 05/22/85)

Domain names (0 replies, 05/22/85)

Names with spaces, underscores, quoted names, etc. (0 replies, 05/23/85)

And, speaking of bad headers (0 replies, 05/23/85)

Lack of domain name (0 replies, 05/23/85)

Domain names defaulting (0 replies, 05/25/85)

Names with spaces (7 replies, 05/28/85)

Fully qualified nodenames (0 replies, 05/29/85)

address change (0 replies, 05/30/85)

Header-People and X.400 (2 replies, 06/01/85)

From lines in mail headers (12 replies, 06/10/85)

RFC920 domains vs. cow patties (5 replies, 06/17/85)

Why "From cbosgd!cbosgd.ATT.UUCP!chris" isn't stupid (8 replies, 06/20/85)

Communication with Central America (0 replies, 06/24/85)

Is there a standard format for cross-domain addresses? (2 replies, 06/29/85)

RCPT TO vs. To: (1 reply, 07/01/85)

RFC920 domains (6 replies, 07/02/85)

Question about ARPA addresses (0 replies, 07/03/85)

Handling %'s and forwarding mail (3 replies, 07/10/85)

Blanks in user names (0 replies, 07/11/85)

reordering header lines (1 reply, 07/11/85)

REPLY-TO field (0 replies, 07/15/85)

Orphaned Response (0 replies, 07/16/85)

> %FROM: Rich Wales <wales@UCLA-LOCUS.ARPA> (0 replies, 07/16/85)

Subject: Ambiguity with the REPLY-TO field (6 replies, 07/17/85)

RFCs (0 replies, 07/20/85)

Domains and routing (0 replies, 07/21/85)

US participation in ISO SC18/WG4 (0 replies, 07/25/85)

ANSI participation on messaging/conferencing (0 replies, 07/25/85)

Some Article Which Notes Threw Away The Title To (2 replies, 07/28/85)

Routing and Gateway Problems (0 replies, 08/02/85)

SMTP source verification. (8 replies, 08/07/85)

Please remove (0 replies, 08/07/85)

Non-domain-style nicknames in outgoing mail (0 replies, 08/09/85)

question about headers (0 replies, 08/14/85)

From: and To: in UUCP land (2 replies, 08/17/85)

Avoiding expansion of mail's metacharacters (2 replies, 08/23/85)

PROFS to RFC822/SMTP conversion? (0 replies, 08/24/85)

mail getting to purdue (0 replies, 08/26/85)

Sendmail (0 replies, 09/10/85)

ARPA to BITNET munging - example (0 replies, 09/10/85)

BITNET to ARPA munging (0 replies, 09/10/85)

Sendmail munges addresses containing dollar signs. (4 replies, 09/10/85)

Echos (0 replies, 09/12/85)

Invalid/questionable host names in mail (0 replies, 09/18/85)

invalid names & multiple names & Godot (0 replies, 09/19/85)

RFC920 country codes (0 replies, 09/20/85)

proposed mail transfer protocol - multimedia (1 reply, 09/20/85)

X.400/MHS implementation (0 replies, 09/23/85)

proposed Mail Transfer Protocol (1 reply, 09/23/85)

MIT-Multics Failed Mail handling, again ... (0 replies, 09/25/85)

rfc standards documentation (0 replies, 10/01/85)

nameservers do not know about domains (2 replies, 10/11/85)

non-additions to host tables (0 replies, 10/12/85)

mail domain addresses (0 replies, 10/16/85)

name servers (0 replies, 10/16/85)

domains (4 replies, 10/16/85)

Host names (0 replies, 10/16/85)

domain questions (0 replies, 10/16/85)

Implementing Mail Domain Addresses and Nameservers (4 replies, 10/16/85)

hosts.txt & the new domain names (1 reply, 10/16/85)

what berkeley has been doing (0 replies, 10/17/85)

Domain names in the NIC table (2 replies, 10/17/85)

Mail routing. Mail optimizing. Mail looping. mail breaking. (1 reply, 10/19/85)

Mail Header Summary Document... (5 replies, 10/19/85)

Registering subdomain hosts (0 replies, 10/23/85)

NIC nickname policy (0 replies, 10/23/85)

news being bounced off arpanet! (0 replies, 10/25/85)

Mail to UC Berkeley hosts (1 reply, 10/29/85)

mail from Berkeley hosts (2 replies, 10/31/85)

Columbia usage of internet domain (2 replies, 10/31/85)

repeated text in message problem (0 replies, 11/01/85)

Rewriting headers in general (0 replies, 11/03/85)

Mail Domain Names: Host table vs. Nameservers (9 replies, 11/04/85)

an extant example of header munging by a mailer (0 replies, 11/14/85)

Domains and servers (0 replies, 11/14/85)

EDU problems in Bitnet. (1 reply, 11/19/85)

CSNET ... (1 reply, 11/26/85)

Correct header for \"%\" hack, Correct header for \"%\" hack (0 replies, 11/26/85)

Correct header for \"%\" hack (1 reply, 11/26/85)

Headers using % hack (0 replies, 11/26/85)

.US as an upper level domain (1 reply, 11/27/85)

new rfc822 header (0 replies, 12/09/85)

Rcf822 extension fields (1 reply, 12/09/85)

generated-by fields (0 replies, 12/09/85)

extension fields (0 replies, 12/10/85)

Need for new field in RFC and MHS standards (3 replies, 12/10/85)

help! (1 reply, 12/11/85)

automatic generation of replies - return path (0 replies, 12/11/85)

A suggestion for preventing machine mail loops (2 replies, 12/12/85)

automatic generation of replies (1 reply, 12/16/85)

More on bizarre headers (0 replies, 12/18/85)

Quiz - Parse this From line (4 replies, 12/20/85)

Electronic Mail Association (0 replies, 01/01/86)

Info on Organization wanted... (0 replies, 01/01/86)

Another thing... (0 replies, 01/02/86)

Mailer problem (1 reply, 01/11/86)

X.400 info wanted (2 replies, 01/16/86)

IMPORTANT NOTICE ABOUT MC.LCS.MIT.EDU (0 replies, 01/23/86)

Allman vs. Honeyman: flame suits on (0 replies, 01/31/86)

loop detection by hop count (1 reply, 02/18/86)

loop detection (2 replies, 02/19/86)

Sun header processing (0 replies, 02/19/86)

lusers missing -REQUEST address (0 replies, 02/19/86)

Subject: Loop control mechanisms in mailing lists (5 replies, 02/20/86)

Stopping loops (0 replies, 02/21/86)

Minor correction (0 replies, 02/22/86)

FYI (0 replies, 02/22/86)

loop control (4 replies, 02/24/86)

sendmail chops addresses (0 replies, 02/25/86)

Full.Names.in.addresses.break.my.mailer (0 replies, 02/26/86)

Mail looping (6 replies, 02/27/86)

Request to be added to Header-People (0 replies, 02/27/86)

Mail looping, changing message ID (0 replies, 02/28/86)

Non-domain host names in mail (4 replies, 03/14/86)

Why "BITNET mail follows"?? (0 replies, 03/15/86)

Path needed to Japan - Looking for Prof. Sasaki (0 replies, 03/20/86)

list moving (0 replies, 05/01/86)

open mouth, insert foot (0 replies, 05/03/86)

testing (0 replies, 05/17/86)

UK net (3 replies, 07/11/86)

Mail header test (0 replies, 07/11/86)

A protocol for distribution lists and their (0 replies, 07/11/86)

\"Restricted\" \"Standards\" (0 replies, 07/11/86)

Its not the fault of Internet Mail -- Re: AMIGO (0 replies, 07/12/86)

braino (0 replies, 07/14/86)

position for emigre soviet mathematician (0 replies, 07/15/86)

Domain branching (0 replies, 07/16/86)

A protocol for distribution lists and their managements (5 replies, 07/16/86)

CCITT lists in the MTL (0 replies, 07/16/86)

Multiple gateways and nameservice (0 replies, 07/18/86)

Second attempt (0 replies, 07/22/86)

Hiearchical structure for loop control in distribution lists (0 replies, 08/03/86)