[..] comp.std.c++

Oldest | Popular

comp.std.c++ is now appearing at a newsgroup near you (0 replies, 07/26/90)

How does a reference differ from a const *const? (1 reply, 08/01/90)

Variable number of arguments in a method (0 replies, 08/01/90)

tutorial book wanted... (0 replies, 08/02/90)

declarations in for loops (2 replies, 08/03/90)

Declarations of Member Functions Outside Class Definitions (3 replies, 08/03/90)

objectives (3 replies, 08/04/90)

Scope of static member initializers (5 replies, 08/04/90)

scope of friend identifiers (0 replies, 08/05/90)

Local functions (1 reply, 08/06/90)

the most dissatisfying part of c++ (13 replies, 08/06/90)

void* (0 replies, 08/07/90)

aliases, ptr coercions, and optimizations (2 replies, 08/07/90)

ANSI C++ and ANSI C (1 reply, 08/07/90)

Scopes and Friend declarations (0 replies, 08/07/90)

Packing Order Question Restated (0 replies, 08/07/90)

C++ Class Library Standards (2 replies, 08/08/90)

foo (7 replies, 08/08/90)

operator . overloading (0 replies, 08/10/90)

looking for refs: (0 replies, 08/11/90)

C++ compiler/debugger environment for the Sun platforms (0 replies, 08/14/90)

Low-Level services in ANSI C++ (1 reply, 08/14/90)

constant expressions (4 replies, 08/15/90)

Correction to Re: Default constructor, unexpected call (0 replies, 08/16/90)

Borland TD/TPROF Error (0 replies, 08/16/90)

Can we allow virtual function member declarations to be inherited? (6 replies, 08/16/90)

null references & dereferencing null pointers (4 replies, 08/17/90)

casting "const" to "non-const" (14 replies, 08/17/90)

Testing the carry bit in Zortech C++ PC386. (0 replies, 08/17/90)

Order of fields within one section (2 replies, 08/18/90)

Allow initializers on static data members (0 replies, 08/18/90)

explicit call to destructor (2 replies, 08/21/90)

Exceptions (0 replies, 08/21/90)

Locality of structure tag names (0 replies, 08/21/90)

Packing Across Inheritance Boundaries is Currently Allowed. (5 replies, 08/21/90)

Questions on the evolving standard. (5 replies, 08/21/90)

set_new_handler (1 reply, 08/21/90)

Inheritance in cfront and g++ (7 replies, 08/22/90)

delete [] p (5 replies, 08/23/90)

Ordering constraints on static constructors/destructors (1 reply, 08/23/90)

case (8 replies, 08/24/90)

Disambiguating inherited pure virtuals with explicit qualifiers (1 reply, 08/24/90)

"packed" objects (29 replies, 08/24/90)

const reference (2 replies, 08/25/90)

const reference, not reference to const (0 replies, 08/26/90)

'const' revisited (22 replies, 08/27/90)

Problem (0 replies, 08/27/90)

C++ reviews requested (0 replies, 08/28/90)

Packing Across Inheritance Boundari (3 replies, 08/28/90)

Casting within MI Graphs (3 replies, 08/28/90)

A problem regarding opening files for i/o in C++ (0 replies, 08/31/90)

standards participation (6 replies, 09/01/90)

Lack of distinction between input & output fn parameters (1 reply, 09/03/90)

Asymmetry: "new (3 replies, 09/05/90)

Protected base classes (3 replies, 09/05/90)

Using return datum type in function signature (2 replies, 09/06/90)

Unnecessary copying of returned object (5 replies, 09/06/90)

C++ version 2.0 (0 replies, 09/07/90)

Proposed Enhancement to select/case (14 replies, 09/07/90)

Separate Decl of Private Member Fcn (11 replies, 09/08/90)

Randomly ordered fields !?!? (27 replies, 09/10/90)

Software Archeology (1 reply, 09/10/90)

Teaching an Object-Oriented Programming Course - Need Your Help (0 replies, 09/10/90)

Interpretation of nested scope rules for class declarations (0 replies, 09/12/90)

Proposed addition to string library: strnew (5 replies, 09/13/90)

Controlling structure layout (5 replies, 09/14/90)

new[] and constructor arguments (1 reply, 09/16/90)

Type bug in conditional expressions? (0 replies, 09/16/90)

Names introduced in friend decls (0 replies, 09/17/90)

default arguments (0 replies, 09/19/90)

Pure virtual destructors: good or bad idea? (4 replies, 09/19/90)

reference classes, and operator. (0 replies, 09/20/90)

Assignments to reference variables [ and operator. (0 replies, 09/21/90)

Constructors/Destructors returning value? (1 reply, 09/21/90)

operator. and ideas for extensions in general (1 reply, 09/28/90)

Can this be done? (1 reply, 10/06/90)

Packing, Ordering, and Rearranging (30 replies, 10/17/90)

Holy Wars (0 replies, 10/18/90)

static data members which are arrays (0 replies, 10/18/90)

Blocks, scopes and declaration statements (3 replies, 10/19/90)

Array References: request for comments (0 replies, 10/20/90)

draft proposals (0 replies, 10/22/90)

static member function for instance creation (0 replies, 10/28/90)

generalized overriding proposal (0 replies, 10/28/90)

Address of member function (1 reply, 10/29/90)

backslash-newline inside C++ comments? (4 replies, 10/30/90)

spec for ?ANSI? C++ (0 replies, 10/30/90)

Question about exception handling (1 reply, 10/31/90)

Faulty Ambiguity Detection with Virtual Bases (0 replies, 10/31/90)

Preventing inheritance of virtual functions' implementations (0 replies, 11/02/90)

C++, Object Design Methodologies and Software Engineering (0 replies, 11/03/90)

A Proposal to Extend C++ with Variable-length Arrays (3 replies, 11/05/90)

objectworks for C++ (0 replies, 11/05/90)

Multiple inheritance oversight? (0 replies, 11/06/90)

const is not object-oriented (8 replies, 11/15/90)

Is there a standard class library??? (5 replies, 11/17/90)

overloading of operators (0 replies, 11/17/90)

"->" == "." proposal (6 replies, 11/18/90)

templates and exceptions in g++? (6 replies, 11/19/90)

X3J16/90-0091 typos and comments (2 replies, 11/20/90)

templates and exceptions in C++ (0 replies, 11/22/90)

character array initialization (11 replies, 11/22/90)

C++/C integration (0 replies, 11/26/90)

standard library (0 replies, 11/26/90)

const is definitely object-oriented (1 reply, 11/27/90)

Anonymous `super' class in C++ (0 replies, 11/29/90)

National character representation of C++ (2 replies, 11/30/90)

design by committee (5 replies, 12/02/90)

calling main in ANSI C (3 replies, 12/03/90)

::Foo (2 replies, 12/05/90)

Multiple inheritance and pointers to base class. (2 replies, 12/05/90)

C++ OO (0 replies, 12/05/90)

overloading and array reference arguments (0 replies, 12/06/90)

C++ Book (0 replies, 12/06/90)

ISO Latin 1? (7 replies, 12/06/90)

C++/C copatibility (0 replies, 12/07/90)

Class Browser (0 replies, 12/07/90)

Suppressing the "this" pointer (0 replies, 12/08/90)

Follow up to "suppressing this ptr" (0 replies, 12/10/90)

default value specifications (1 reply, 12/12/90)

~const retracted temporarily for revision (0 replies, 12/12/90)

Constructor Questions (0 replies, 12/13/90)

Nit of the day. (1 reply, 12/17/90)

Leapin' lvalues (0 replies, 12/18/90)

A question on bit-field widths. (0 replies, 12/18/90)

Bitfields in unions? (0 replies, 12/18/90)

Accesibility change in virtual functions (1 reply, 12/19/90)

test (0 replies, 12/21/90)

parameter type matching (4 replies, 01/03/91)

Order of destructor calls for auto objects (8 replies, 01/04/91)

Nested Class Definitions Question (0 replies, 01/05/91)

Smart Pointers -- A proposed language extension (1 reply, 01/06/91)

~const Rev 1.6 (7 replies, 01/08/91)

Is comp.std.c++ archived somewhere? (0 replies, 01/08/91)

ARM on order of static initialization (1 reply, 01/10/91)

C++ 2.>1< meeded, DOS+UNIX (0 replies, 01/10/91)

ATT C++ port for DS3100 and Encore Multimax (1 reply, 01/12/91)

Comparison functions for qsort (1 reply, 01/13/91)

GNU C++ on ISC2.0.2 (0 replies, 01/13/91)

Smart pointers and Stupid people (2 replies, 01/13/91)

gnu++ sources (0 replies, 01/14/91)

file io (0 replies, 01/15/91)

Standardization Issues Only (0 replies, 01/18/91)

AT&T C++ 2.0 Efficacious? (1 reply, 01/19/91)

Koenig's excellent article on the standardization process (0 replies, 01/19/91)

DISCONTINUING comp.std.c++ (0 replies, 01/20/91)

the SUN way.. *&$^#%) (2 replies, 01/22/91)

preprocessing (1 reply, 01/22/91)

static functions (0 replies, 01/22/91)

"static" classes (0 replies, 01/23/91)

Conversion to |void*| and back: LEGAL (1 reply, 01/23/91)

Smarter pointers - another solution (0 replies, 01/23/91)

A makefile for C++ (0 replies, 01/25/91)

copies and copy constructors (1 reply, 01/29/91)

functions within functions (3 replies, 02/01/91)

Should unary operators convert? (2 replies, 02/02/91)

overloading resolution and const (2 replies, 02/03/91)

request for comments (7 replies, 02/05/91)

question re overloaded operator new (0 replies, 02/05/91)

ANSI C/C++ function prototypes for XLib, Xt (0 replies, 02/06/91)

Add-with-carry operator (3 replies, 02/07/91)

Are addresses of const members const? (1 reply, 02/08/91)

Conversion to |void*| and back: A NO-BRAINER (1 reply, 02/08/91)

Is this code using casts valid in C++ ? (1 reply, 02/08/91)

The cost of incompatibilities (0 replies, 02/08/91)

Why no renew (0 replies, 02/09/91)

YACCable C++ grammar (0 replies, 02/10/91)

Proposal: template default arguments (0 replies, 02/11/91)

munch going away? (0 replies, 02/13/91)

C++ typing not so strong (0 replies, 02/13/91)

Use of class-declared enums outside of that class (0 replies, 02/14/91)

Dynamic Binding by Argument Type (3 replies, 02/14/91)

reference operators and reference conversion (0 replies, 02/14/91)

Templates...? (0 replies, 02/15/91)

Calling constructors for parms passed by value (3 replies, 02/15/91)

named parameters (1 reply, 02/16/91)

No friendship for private constructors? (0 replies, 02/16/91)

Exception handling? (0 replies, 02/19/91)

allow convertible return types? (0 replies, 02/19/91)

SUMMARY: Responses to ~const pre-proposal, Rev 1.6 (0 replies, 02/20/91)

Responses to ~const 1.6: General reactions (0 replies, 02/20/91)

Responses to ~const 1.6: Fate of cast-from-const (0 replies, 02/20/91)

Responses to ~const 1.6: Name change (0 replies, 02/20/91)

Responses to ~const 1.6: Compiler complexity? (0 replies, 02/20/91)

Responses to ~const 1.6: Experience? (1 reply, 02/20/91)

RE-POST: ~const pre-proposal, Rev 1.8 (0 replies, 02/20/91)

Thanks for the help... (0 replies, 02/23/91)

local type names (0 replies, 02/23/91)

typedefnames as classnames (0 replies, 02/25/91)

small error? (0 replies, 02/25/91)

lifetime of unnamed arguments? (0 replies, 02/27/91)

sgetc bug (0 replies, 02/27/91)

PROTOIZE/UNPROTOIZE version 1.39.0 now available (0 replies, 02/27/91)

Default copy constructor not making a copy (1 reply, 02/27/91)

operator delete modifying pointers? (2 replies, 02/28/91)

Variable arguments (0 replies, 03/02/91)

Co-ordinating the polymorphism in C++ (9 replies, 03/03/91)

Responses to ~const 1.6: Possible generalizations of ~const (6 replies, 03/04/91)

What is the current state of play? (0 replies, 03/05/91)

CFP: USENIX C++ Advanced Topics Workshop (0 replies, 03/06/91)

C++ Programmer looking for challenging postition (0 replies, 03/06/91)

Responses to ~const 1.6: Alternatives to ~const (2 replies, 03/07/91)

Dynamic type loss considered harmless (5 replies, 03/08/91)

A possibly stupid proposal (0 replies, 03/08/91)

overloading vs. virtual functions (8 replies, 03/08/91)

default/variable/implicit arguments (0 replies, 03/08/91)

Encouraging readonly memory (4 replies, 03/10/91)

distinguishing operator[] on left and right (12 replies, 03/12/91)

~virtual (2 replies, 03/12/91)

template base classes (2 replies, 03/12/91)

parsing C++ woes (1 reply, 03/13/91)

Explicit Destructor Call Syntax (1 reply, 03/17/91)

Dynamic Type checking and Exception Handling (1 reply, 03/19/91)

C++ and Objective C for the Mac (2 replies, 03/22/91)

Simple example needs dynamic types? (0 replies, 03/22/91)

Tags, typecodes, experience with these things. (3 replies, 03/23/91)

C++ style guide (0 replies, 03/25/91)

X3j16 "contractions" WG; pointers to members considered redundant (1 reply, 03/26/91)

Final draft of ~const proposal (0 replies, 03/26/91)

Pointer arguments for overloaded operators (0 replies, 03/27/91)

Shadowing of base class functions with other arguments (0 replies, 03/27/91)

protected != public-to-derived (12 replies, 03/27/91)

type/member tags (37 replies, 03/28/91)

Conversions to/from void*, redux (13 replies, 03/28/91)

implicit type conversions considered harmful: X3j16 "contractions" WG (3 replies, 03/28/91)

Definition With Incomplete Type Should Be An Error (2 replies, 03/29/91)

Compiled templates? (2 replies, 03/30/91)

Errata list for ARM (2 replies, 04/01/91)

Objects already contain type information => binary virtual functions (1 reply, 04/01/91)

X3j16 "contractions" (3 replies, 04/01/91)

Constructor can subvert constness (2 replies, 04/01/91)

Proposed implementation of contravariance on function return type (0 replies, 04/01/91)

Return type of operator-> (0 replies, 04/02/91)

overloading the class assignment operator (0 replies, 04/02/91)

deleting objects and access control (0 replies, 04/02/91)

operator dot? (4 replies, 04/03/91)

type definitions and scopes (2 replies, 04/05/91)

How can I report an error when constructor parameters are wrong. (3 replies, 04/08/91)

parsing C++ woes: a puzzle (0 replies, 04/09/91)

overloading templates (1 reply, 04/10/91)

c++ books, help! (2 replies, 04/10/91)

Proposal for group access in C++ (0 replies, 04/11/91)

Initialization ambiguities (0 replies, 04/11/91)

C++ possible new construct proposal (4 replies, 04/14/91)

handling of return values (0 replies, 04/14/91)

Usability of pointers to members and MI (0 replies, 04/14/91)

g++ vs c++ (0 replies, 04/16/91)

What is "int &const r"? (1 reply, 04/16/91)

chess programs in c++ (0 replies, 04/18/91)

archives for comp.std.c++? (0 replies, 04/19/91)

book needed for self study (0 replies, 04/20/91)

Overloaded operator dot (1 reply, 04/22/91)

What is int &const r; (1 reply, 04/23/91)

Assignment operators return lvalues -- why? (0 replies, 04/23/91)

protected derivation (1 reply, 04/25/91)

makefiles for g++ (0 replies, 04/25/91)

Idea for optimized copy functions (0 replies, 04/27/91)

Assignment operators return lvalues / classes and types (3 replies, 04/28/91)

Pure functions and derived classes (1 reply, 04/29/91)

Looking for C++ compiler and Symbolic debugger (0 replies, 05/01/91)

backward virtual function call (3 replies, 05/07/91)

Standard identification of compilers? (4 replies, 05/09/91)

Require some info on C++ (0 replies, 05/09/91)

New/Delete vs. Constructors/Destructors (0 replies, 05/11/91)

Turbo C++ 2.0 and the Heap Expander software. (0 replies, 05/11/91)

ANSI C++ (2 replies, 05/12/91)

c++ for AIX RS/6000 (0 replies, 05/14/91)

name space proposal (2 replies, 05/14/91)

Default type of "0" (7 replies, 05/14/91)

Proposed: "closures" (9 replies, 05/14/91)

What are good books/programs to learn C++ on the PC (0 replies, 05/15/91)

Color pallettes and Borland C++ (0 replies, 05/23/91)

Proposal: 'virtual' class members for C++ (0 replies, 05/25/91)

Class declaration/definition consistency (1 reply, 05/26/91)

"module" facility for top-level namespace control (31 replies, 05/27/91)

Lund C++ Seminars 13-14 June 1991 (0 replies, 05/28/91)

Temporaries in constructors (0 replies, 05/29/91)

Inheritance for enum types ??? (5 replies, 05/30/91)

Constructor question (8 replies, 06/02/91)

Boolean confusion (3 replies, 06/02/91)

Classix C++ library (0 replies, 06/03/91)

constructors for global objects (0 replies, 06/04/91)

Classix C++ Summary (0 replies, 06/14/91)

Creeping feature #769: `new auto' (3 replies, 06/15/91)

g++ (1 reply, 06/16/91)

Adding multiple inheritance to a single inheritance class library. (2 replies, 06/17/91)