daniel@terra.ucsc.edu (Daniel Edelson) (08/07/90)
From the ARM, section 3.2, Scopes ``A name first declared by a friend declaration belongs to the global scope.'' From the ARM, section 11.4, Friends ``If a class or function mentioned as a friend has not been declared its name is entered in the same scope as the name of the class containing the declaration.'' Clearly these conflict, particularly in the presense of local and nested classes. Is anyone at AT&T willing to bless rule or the other? Daniel Edelson daniel@cis.ucsc.edu