Oldest | Popular
Ahem, how about some correct tables and support please... (0 replies, 01/17/90)
Output of your job "POLICY-L" (0 replies, 01/17/90)
Is there any hope on the BITnet side of getting everything (0 replies, 01/18/90)
Educating users (0 replies, 01/18/90)
Ahem, etc. (1 reply, 01/19/90)
Network Misuse (0 replies, 01/19/90)
SIGUCCS ... lets be constructive. (1 reply, 01/19/90)
BITNET 2 (0 replies, 02/02/90)
User interfaces for list postings (0 replies, 02/04/90)
Letter of the law (2 replies, 02/05/90)
Specifications, standardization, and reality (0 replies, 02/05/90)
Standardized tools (3 replies, 02/05/90)
User interface for list postings (16 replies, 02/07/90)
BITNET Restructuring Proposal (7 replies, 02/08/90)
9600-baud Dedicated Leased Line requirement (0 replies, 02/09/90)
Technical direction vs. Services (3 replies, 02/11/90)
Topologies (1 reply, 02/12/90)
Alternatives to LISTSERV (0 replies, 02/12/90)
A new LISTSERV (2 replies, 02/12/90)
What's in a name (4 replies, 02/13/90)
Specs vs. Standards (2 replies, 02/13/90)
BITNET Trademark (0 replies, 02/13/90)
EDUCOM support for software development ... (1 reply, 02/13/90)
Professional Organizations (1 reply, 02/13/90)
The fall of Bitnet (0 replies, 02/28/90)
Policy on Sites Leaving BITNET (2 replies, 03/01/90)