[comp.os.os2.programmer] why os/2 doesn't have fork

andrew@ramona.Cary.NC.US (Andrew Ernest) (03/31/91)

In article <1991Mar29.141629.9239@hubcap.clemson.edu> ibmman@eng.clemson.edu ((the) IBMMAN) writes:
>I have never heard of one, and I think it would be extremely difficult to
>write one due to the fact that there can be multiple data segments.  I'm

I don't know the reason why os/2 doesn't have fork() but it ISN'T because
there are multiple data segments.  Although they are now obsolete, there
used to be UNIX systems which ran on 80286 systems.  These systems allocated
a new segment each time you called sbrk().  They had no problems with fork().
-- 
Andrew Ernest <andrew@ramona.Cary.NC.US>