S.Kille@purple.cs.ucl.ac.UK (Steve Kille) (02/16/89)
Good grief - something has eaten your backslashes! As you say, if this problem is widespread, the confusion is understandable. All the paper and online copies which I have are OK. Please can eveyone check this! Steve >From: grimm@de.dbp.gmd.darmstadt >To: S.Kille@uk.ac.ucl.cs >Subject: Re: \. >Date: 14 Feb 89 11:47 +0100 > > 4.1.3 - last para >Steve, >I probably haven't got a good copy of the RFC987 paper. The place you >mention, looks in my copy like this: > ... > dmn-pair = " ." > For example: C$US.ADMD$ATT.~ROLE$BIG .Chief >Should it rather be like this???: > ... > dmn-pair = "\." > For example: C$US.ADMD$ATT.~ROLE$BIG\.Chief >If others have the same blank instead of backslash, the confusion >of the last weeks is understandable. >Greetings --- Ruediger