[comp.protocols.iso.x400.gateway] RFC 987

gregoire@cernvax.UUCP (gregoire) (11/16/88)

At the Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL), we're implementing
an RFC987 gateway - and are having some problems understanding the
way an auto-forwarded message is handled. On page 55 of the RFC, it says
that when p2.Heading.autoforwarded is set to TRUE, all previously generated
RFC 822 field names are to be prepended with Autoforwarded-. I have two
questions: 1. is this recursive, i.e. will the To: of a twice autoforwared 
message be prepended TWICE with Autoforwarded-?
and 2. does Autoforwarded- get prepended before P1-generated RFC822 field names?

Any help would be appreciated. Replies to this newsgroup or directly to me
at GREENE(A)elde.epfl.ch .

Nancy Greene EPFL/LIT

S.Kille@purple.cs.ucl.ac.UK (Steve Kille) (03/29/89)

I'm posting this message wide - apologies to those who get duplicates.
Please do NOT reply to all of the CC lists.   

RFC 987 is a specification to map between RFC 822 based protocols and X.400
(1984).   I have just completed the first draft of the version to map
to X.400 (1988) - a quite substantial update.   For now, I am calling this
RFC 987(88).  

I hope that this specification can gain wide acceptance, following input
from all interested parties.

I propose to use the ifip-gtwy list to discuss this specification.  I will
be circulating the specification by mail in two weeks time (April 11th) -
experience has suggested that there are too many interested parties without
file transfer access.  This should give interested people sufficient time to
get onto the list.  Send to ifip-gtwy-request@tis.llnl.gov.  For UK people
send to arpa-mhs-request@uk.ac.ucl.cs.  I suggest that other Europeans
should get national expansions.

People should also get themselves copies of X.400 (88) - at least the DIS.
I'm sure that "how to get the standard" will be discussed on ifip-gtwy.

I am proposing to hold a meeting on 27-28 June in London to finalise this
specification following electronic discussion.  Put this date in your
diaries!  If there is sufficient request, it may be useful to also hold a
one day meeting sometime in early May.  

Steve