S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.UK (Steve Kille) (02/26/91)
I will try to make this clear in the revised 1148. If you are not happy with my text, we can continue the discussion then. Steve >From: harald.alvestrand@no.sintef.elab-runit >To: ifip-gtwy@no.sintef.elab-runit >Subject: RFC-1148/2: Why is the gateway table mandatory? >Date: 26 Feb 91 12:16:19 GMT >Steve, >as the guru among the experts, could YOU give an explanation of why the >gateway table you propose will be mandatory rather than advisory? >That is, can you give at least one case where a gateway, connected to the >interconnected part of the Internet, will not be able to forward a message >in the correct direction when the gateway table is not present? >This message was POSTED - I will enjoy waiting for it to arrive in my >mailbox... > Harald Tveit Alvestrand >Harald.Alvestrand@elab-runit.sintef.no >C=no;PRMD=uninett;O=sintef;OU=elab-runit;S=alvestrand;G=harald >+47 7 59 70 94