hta@isolde.er.sintef.no (Harald Tveit Alvestrand) (03/27/91)
Two questions:
1) What, if any, note will RFC-1148/bis be taking of the current work
on SMTP extensions?
(if the answer is "none", new question: How should we work on it?)
2) When is RFC-1148/bis coming out for review?
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Harald.Alvestrand@elab-runit.sintef.no
C=no;PRMD=uninett;O=sintef;OU=elab-runit;S=alvestrand;G=harald
+47 7 59 70 94S.Kille@cs.ucl.ac.UK (Steve Kille) (03/27/91)
>From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <hta@no.sintef.er.isolde> >To: ifip-gtwy@no.sintef.er.isolde >Subject: Coordination with SMTP extensions >Date: 27 Mar 91 06:48:55 GMT >Two questions: >1) What, if any, note will RFC-1148/bis be taking of the current work > on SMTP extensions? > (if the answer is "none", new question: How should we work on it?) By reference. I will be pointing at the output document of this group. I believe that it will be an improvement on RFC 934. I think that it is important that 1148bis does not try to compete with this effort. I would ecnourage people with X.400 expertise to contribute to the IETF-SMTP effort. >2) When is RFC-1148/bis coming out for review? As soon as I can make some time. The slot I had allocated to do this was passed. I can't make any promises, but appreciate the importance of this. I have a marked up copy (red ink on over half the pages), and "just" need to do the typing. >-- > Harald Tveit Alvestrand >Harald.Alvestrand@elab-runit.sintef.no >C=no;PRMD=uninett;O=sintef;OU=elab-runit;S=alvestrand;G=harald >+47 7 59 70 94 Steve