[comp.arch] Looking for a TRUE NeXT comparison

ken@gatech.edu (Ken Seefried iii) (10/17/88)

I don't know about Suns and IBM PS/2s, but I DO know the "true" student cost 
of a Mac II.  Here at Tech we recently had a promotion by Apple to sell more
Mac IIs.  A friend at Apple said it was the best  price anywhere other than
for apple employees.

For a Mac II (NOT Mac IIx) with:

	CPU (16MHz 68020/68881 6 NuBus Slots)
	MMU upgrade
	2MB RAM
	640x480x8 (256 colours) card and monitor
	A/UX on an 80MB HD
	3.5" floppy drive

	total: $5995

Just to get the price even with the NeXT machine, throw in the $650 1MB
upgrade to give a price of about $6550 for a 3MB Mac II.

Now lets compare this to the NeXT machine:

	NeXT has 5MB more memory
	NeXT can expand to 16MB on the motherboard (maybe 64, with 4M SIMMS)
	Apple can expand to 8MB (or 32MB with 4M SIMMS, its been done, I believe)
	NeXT has ~170MB more disk (removable disk, remember)
	Apple has a floppy drive
	NeXT has ~4x more screen area
	Apple has 252 more colours
	NeXT has ethernet
	Apple has AppleTalk
	NeXT has a 25MHz 68030 and 68882
	Apple has a 16MHz 68020 and 68881 (the IIx only has a 16MHz 68030)
	NeXT has a 56001 DSP, good for all sorts of fun, plus its a HELL of
		a floating point chip if your not doing sound type things.
	NeXT has oodles of I/O processors to reduce the load on the CPU.
	Apple has 1 CPU doing almost everything.
	NeXT has a real windowing interface (i wish it wasX, but DPS is pretty 
		interesting...I'll have to give it a chance)
	Apple will have X Windows Real Soon Now 
	NeXT uses Mach, which is 4.3 BSD compatable
	NeXT uses Mach, which supports multiple processors easily
	NeXT uses Mach, which is designed for networks
	NeXT uses Mach, which is designed for efficiency
	Apple uses A/UX, which in 2 years or so will be a pretty good unix.
		Right now though, its System V rel.2 with a few 4.2 features.
	NeXT provides Objective-C, a very good object oriented programming 
		langauge.
	Apple provides 'cpp'.  I don't think there is Obj-C for A/UX.
	Apple has the 'toolbox'...very good idea.
	NeXT has a collection of objects for toolbox like work.
	NeXT bundles Mathematica (very slick, deceptively useful)
	Apple doesn't, and it'll cost you $900 to get it.
	NeXT bundles SQL, dictionaries, thesauri, and Shakespeare (god knows
		why, but I think its great), WP, quotations, etc.
	Apple, as Joe Izusu sez, doesn't...All you get is A/UX and the standard
		Unix utilities.

I REALLY shudder to think what an A/UX box would cost that met the NeXT specs!
That is, aside from the fact that things like Mach and Obj-C are not availible
for A/UX.
	
Lets talk printers:

	NeXT Postscript laser printer:		$2000
	Apple PS laser printer (approx):	$7000
	Cheapest PS printer that I have seen:	$3500

Lets talk disk:

	whoops, forgot...Apple doesn't offer a 330 or 660MB drive...

	I don't know what the Apple CD-ROM drive costs, but then, its not
	eraseable or writable...

I almost bought a Mac II A/UX machine.  I like the Mac II.  I have the $6000+
to buy it.  I'm buying a NeXT machine.

When you get down to brass tacks, NeXT is giving you an order of magnatude
more features for your dollar than Apple (or IBM or Sun, i bet).  More
software (real applications, not just tools), better, faster, more versitile
hardware, and many times the future possibilities.  It was
wrong of the Wall Street Journal to misrepresent the facts Re: NeXT cost
comparison, but under the microscope, nothing changes.  The NeXT machine
has the bang-per-buck factor all to itself.

Jeez, I'm really trying not to look like the emmisary from the Church of the
Almighty Jobs...I used to be the biggest NeXT cynic around here...

	ken seefried iii	...!{akgua, allegra, amd, harpo, hplabs, 
	ken@gatech.edu		masscomp, rlgvax, sb1, uf-cgrl, unmvax,
	ccastks@gitvm1.bitnet	ut-ngp, ut-sally}!gatech!ken