sam@lfcs.ed.ac.uk (S. Manoharan) (02/09/89)
I had unsubscribed to comp.lang.c recently. But I find that C is still haunting me. Hmm! :-() --- sam%uk.ac.edinburgh.lfcs%uk.ac.ucl.cs.nss@net.cs.relay
hascall@atanasoff.cs.iastate.edu (John Hascall) (02/11/89)
In article <1357@etive.ed.ac.uk> sam@lfcs.ed.ac.uk (S. Manoharan) writes: >I had unsubscribed to comp.lang.c recently. But I find that C is >still haunting me. Hmm! :-() It is sometimes convenient to have a "common" language to describe architectural features. I can think of worse ones than 'C'. Does anyone still use register transfer language? It seems to me that: R1 = ~C | B; is as good as: _ R1 <-- C v B ...and easier to type. /* John Hascall */