mrc@Tomobiki-Cho.CAC.Washington.EDU (Mark Crispin) (09/01/89)
I doubt people today would consider it a benefit, but another
PDP-10 benefit which definitely affected Lisp implementations was the
fact that it was a uniquely pleasurable architecture to write assembly
code. Consequently, many bright hackers would hand-code large and
quite efficient assembly language programs for the PDP-10, including
Lisp kernels, in preference to higher-level languages. It was almost
always possible to hand-code an assembly program for the PDP-10, in
the same (or less!) time to do the same job as a higher-level language
program.
Of course, compilers today are much better and "modern" machine
architectures are definitely *not* pleasurable to code in assembly.
Also, the PDP-10 experience with lock-in to a single hardware vendor
was perhaps the best argument that Unix has ever had.
Mark Crispin / 6158 Lariat Loop NE / Bainbridge Island, WA 98110-2020
mrc@CAC.Washington.EDU / MRC@WSMR-SIMTEL20.Army.Mil / (206) 842-2385
Atheist & Proud / 450cc Rebel pilot -- a step up from 250cc's!!!
tabesaserarenakerebanaranakattarashii...kisha no kisha ga kisha de kisha-shita
sumomo mo momo, momo mo momo, momo ni mo iroiro aru
uraniwa ni wa niwa, niwa ni wa niwa niwatori ga iru