[comp.arch] why SCSI is good

mo@messy.bellcore.com (Michael O'Dell) (08/18/90)

SCSI spans a much larger performance space than all it's competitors.
By building a basic double-wide double-fast SCSI-II controller,
and then using only one cable at regular speed, you get an interface
which can provide a CHEAP interconnect at modest speeds for small
numbers of disks, printers, scanners, tapes, etc, all the way up to
a theoretical 40 Megabytes/second (probably 30-35 is readily realizable)
for the double-speed-double-wide interface for things like disk
arrays, all under the imperfect-but-better-than-anything-else-around
umbrella of the Common Command Set.  And it doesn't take half an
acre of custom VLSI to do it (a clear distinction from IPI-3).
(Oh yes, the speeds assume that your bus and memory controller
are hoss enough to handle it.)

So, if you have only a finite amount of engineering time to build device
interconnects for a family of computers, doing an adaptable SCSI-II
double-wide double-fast controller leverages your engineering talent
like nothing else you can build.

This is why I predict that SCSI-II will squeeze IPI-3 right out of a niche.

	-Mike