steve@hubcap.clemson.edu ("Steve" Stevenson) (10/29/90)
How is/are prolog machine developments going? I have the following references from Eugene Miya's bibliography. Would someone please update them? ======================================== %A Yaohan Chu %A Kozo Itano %T Organization of a Parallel Prolog Machine %J International Workshop on High-Level Computer Architecture %I Univ. of Maryland %D May 1984 %P 4.18-4.30 %K PROLOG machines %A Noriyoshi Ito %A Kanae Masuda %T Parallel Inference Machine Based on the Data Flow Model %J International Workshop on High-Level Computer Architecture %I Univ. of Maryland %D May 1984 %P 4.31-4.40 %K PROLOG machines %A Y. Kaneda %A N. Tamura %A K. Wada %A H. Matsuda %T Sequential PROLOG Machine PEK: Architecture and Software System %J International Workshop on High-Level Computer Architecture %I Univ. of Maryland %D May 1984 %P 4.1-4.6 %K PROLOG machines %A Evan Tick %T Towards a Multiple Pipelined Prolog Processor %J International Workshop on High-Level Computer Architecture %I Univ. of Maryland %D May 1984 %P 4.7-4.17 %K PROLOG machines ============================================================= By the same token, what is the situation with functional machines like Symbolics? Is it the case that the economics is poor? Are there enough folks who want these different models but don't represent enough of a market or is there something fundamentally wrong with non-von Neumann architetures? steve -- =============================================================================== Steve (really "D. E.") Stevenson steve@hubcap.clemson.edu Department of Computer Science, (803)656-5880.mabell Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-1906