pdbain@bwdls58.bnr.ca (Peter Bain) (02/09/91)
In article <4313@ns-mx.uiowa.edu> jones@pyrite.cs.uiowa.edu (Douglas W. Jones,201H MLH,3193350740,3193382879) writes: >> - Why did(/do) the Feds love it so much? > Because having a language standard is so much better than having no > standard, even if the language could be improved on. JOVIAL was > never widely used or loved outside the Air Force and their > contractors, but within the Air Force, it was the standard language > until Ada came along. Didn't/doesn't the USAF have another standard language by the name of CMS II? -peter
jimm@ima.isc.com (Jim McGrath) (02/11/91)
In article <5555@bwdls58.UUCP> pdbain@bwdls58.bnr.ca (Peter Bain) writes: > >Didn't/doesn't the USAF have another standard language by the name of >CMS II? > -peter I think it was the Navy. I used CMS-2 on AN-UYK 7s and 20s back in the mid seventies for a project CSC was doing for the Navy. Jim