[sci.bio] Mutant flies - success, ethics, history

jahayes@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu (05/28/91)

> If there were some way to perfectly record the DNA sequence of screw flies and
> the technology existed to reconstruct a living specimen, then I would
> not have so many qualms about eradicating them.  Under the circumstances,
> however, I believe that it is insufficient to argue that risk to human life
> always justifies the total destruction of a "lower" life form.
> 
> --
> Paul Callahan
> callahan@cs.jhu.edu

Paul:

I wouldn't sweat it. Given our past lack of success at eradicating
species on purpose, I think it unlikely that we'll suddenly get good
at it. I would recommend a book called "The Screwworm Problem" put
out by the University of Texas Press, by Dick Richardson. Good background.

I also wonder about the ethical quality of the issue. Would it be 
unethical to swat a mosquito? A hundred mosquitos? A billion? Most of
a species? All of it? At what point are our actions unethical, and
why not before that point?

Finally, I very much doubt that screwworm flies, and the rest of
the family to which they belong (Sarcophagidae, I think, just off
the top of my head. Anybody want to correct that?) are a recent
evolutionary event. There are more species of insects than all other
animal groups combined; it's hard for me to believe that any resource
usable by insects was just recently colonized. I suspect that the
flies used to attack native meso- and macro-mammals, like deer.

Ta, all,

Josh Hayes, Zoology, Miami of Ohio
jahayes@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu