jrc (07/05/82)
Considering the absolutely atrocious standard of spelling set by usenet articles in general, I am more than surprised that there has been such a furor over such a simple and understandable misspelling as "ov" for "of". The only objection I would have would be based on consistency: if you are going to respell one word phonetically, why not respell them all that way? Then we kan awl wayst owr tym tryin 2 desifer junk lyk this.