ecn-pa.alexande (07/22/82)
I do not have any intention of forcing anyone to use non-sexist language. But I do have a few comments on some responses to my article on the net: 1) I try, (and I will not say that I am universally successful) to use non-sexist forms in all of my speech, unless specific reference to gender is called for. My friends and associates do not say that my speech sounds awkward, ridiculous, or silly. In fact, I think I can say that my use of language is regarded fairly highly. If someone chooses, (for whatever ill- advised reason) to use non-sexist terms scornfully, without wanting to be using them, he or she will undoubtedly sound ridiculous spitting out those "chairPERSONs" and "he OR SHEs". I use them because non-sexism is an important goal to me, and the use of sexist terms in my language would be a betrayal of my own beliefs. If you do not choose to use them, that is your choice, but you should be aware that this may say to someone who values non-sexism that you are not a supporter of this goal, or are at best a lukewarm supporter. Whether this is true or not is immaterial: you may be perceived in this light. 2) Do not underestimate the power of words. An inept choice of words has caused many politicians to lose their offices. The lack of a word for a thing has often caused that thing to go undiscovered for decades, even centuries. A wrong word can cause a person to appear uneducated, or a fool. The manner of presentation of an idea can cause its acceptance or rejection. Often a careful choice of words can cause a dismal performance to be presented in a glowing light, or can cause a fine performance to be poorly perceived. I do not claim that the use of non-sexist language, of and by itself, can cause all sexist actions to disappear, or all discrimination to be ended, or all preconceived notions of the sex of any unknown professional, office-holder, or any other class of person to be entirely washed away. However, I will claim that the use of non-sexist language will exert an effect in the direction of accomplishing these things. A person who does not think in terms of sexist words will not be as likely to perform sexist actions. A person who has not formed the habit of thinking of women as a sub-class of men will be less likely to discriminate against women. And if people start thinking in terms of what *people* are qualified/available/running/present/etc. rather than what *men* are qualified/available/running/present/etc., they will begin to lose their preconceived, prejudiced opinions about what sex a person needs to be to accomplish a job that anyone could accomplish. If one values non-sexism as I do, (and I recognize that not every one does, and I really am not speaking to those people), one should realize that the use of non-sexist language can help in the achievement of this goal. Alan Alexander-Manifold Purdue Library Systems pur-ee!ecn-pa!alexande