[net.nlang] Proper English Usage during Nuclear War

sdyer@bbncca.ARPA (Steve Dyer) (11/21/83)

As the credits rolled at the end of "The Day After", I was horrified to
spy the following line--luckily I could verify this, since I taped it:

	"In it's (sic) presentation,
	 ABC has taken no position as to how such an event
	 may be initiated or avoided."

I guess that in the nuclear debate (if not in war itself) proper usage
is the first to go ...
-- 
/Steve Dyer
decvax!bbncca!sdyer
sdyer@bbncca

ags%pucc-k@phs.UUCP (Seaman) (11/22/83)

References: <332@bbncca.ARPA>
Relay-Version:version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site duke.UUCP
Posting-Version:version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pucc-k
Path:duke!decvax!harpo!floyd!clyde!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!CS-Mordred!Pucc-H:Pucc-I:Pucc-K:ags
Message-ID:<118@pucc-k>
Date:Tue, 22-Nov-83 15:48:53 EST
Organization:Purdue University Computing Center

I also noticed ABC's improper use of "it's" (for "belonging to it")
in their closing credits for "The Day After".  I noticed the same usage
several months ago (in quarter-inch-high letters) in a full-page magazine
ad for a Radio Shack TRS-80.

				Dave Seaman