[net.nlang] Natural Language Deficiancies

dwl@hou4b.UUCP (D Levenson) (11/02/84)

The lack of distinction between you(singular) and you(plural) in
English keeps being used as an example of something that's missing.
While it is, in deed, missing from modern usage, the language did
have this distinction, and our ancestors disposed of it.

Originally, thou meant the second-person singular, and you meant the
second person plural.  There was an exception, however, in that when
addressing Royalty, it was considered correct to say `you' even when
addressing only one of them.  (They still use `we' to refer to
themselves, even when the speaker is singular.)   In later years, it
was a compliment to address someone as `you', even if he were not one
of the Royals. (Just as we address someone as Sir who has not been
knighted, today.)  This usage prevailed, and `thou' has disapeared
from modern English, having been replaced by `you'.  The need to
compliment one's listener apparently was greater than the need for
two second person nominative pronouns.

Even more recently, it seems, a need to distinguish re-appeared, and
we began addressing multiple people as `you all' or `youse' or
`y'all' `you folks' etc.

Dave Levenson
AT&T-ISL
Holmdel