[net.nlang] d*mn, sh*t, f*ck, un*x

jack@rlgvax.UUCP (Jack Waugh) (07/11/85)

> Why do people use 'sh*t', 'f*ck', 'd*mn', and 'un*x' when they
> know darn (damn?) well WE know what they're saying, and THEY know
> what they're saying, but they won't come out and say it!
> 
> To illustrate the dangers of using '*' in place of a real letter,
> I have scanned our local dictionary for words which match these
> patterns, as if each word were to be expanded as the Shell
> does (ignoring the case of letters).
. . .
> Gordon A. Moffett               ...!{ihnp4,cbosgd,sun}!amdahl!gam

When people write "g*d", "un*x", etc., they don't mean by the "*"
what it means in the shell.  It means substitute just one vowel.

The reason for writing the words with the asterisk substituted for
one a letter is that although the person wants to use the
word, writing it in full is somehow k'pu (taboo).  In the case of
"unix", the taboo is trademark restrictions.  Many Jews won't
write "god" for fear that it might be printed and then destroyed
and the writer would be partly responsible for this violation of
religious law.  As for "shit" and "fuck", the prohibitions may not
be part of organized religion, but I suspect their origin may be
similar to religious origins.  Western culture attributes magic
to words almost to the point of confusing words with the concepts
they stand for.  Shit is bad (you don't want it in your mouth or
eyes because of the bacteria), so the word itself is treated as
though it were as bad and therefore shouldn't be written.