Telecom-Request%usc-eclc@brl-bmd.UUCP (01/13/84)
TELECOM Digest Friday, 13 Jan 1984 Volume 4 : Issue 8 Today's Topics: Alternative LD Services The rise of the computer state Corridors ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: 12 Jan 1984 1219-PST Subject: Alternative LD Services From: WMartin at Office-3 (Will Martin) After seeing that chart I sent in Telecom, I remembered the other comment on the subject I meant to add: I have a friend who subscribed to one of the alternative services; I believe that he chose Allnet based on price. He does save money. However, he has found that he is often cut off in the middle of conversations. His habits included late-night calls that continued for long durations. He has found that his connections were often abruptly terminated. He complained to the vendor, and was told that this was normal, and he should expect it. It seems that portions of their network are shut down during periods of low usage, and calls can still be made via alternate paths, but calls in progress on the affected portions are interrupted without warning. This is of course irritating, and a definite inferiority to standard Bell/AT&T service. Could we have comments from others on this list who use the altenative services with regard to these sort of "quality" issues, as opposed to basing all our comparisons on price alone? Will Martin ------------------------------ Date: 12 Jan 1984 1636-PST From: Jon Solomon <JSol@USC-ECLC> Subject: The rise of the computer state A submission prepared by Rob Kling of the University of California, Irvine, talking about the Rise of the Computer State, and how some politicians are using computers to increase their power unfairly (those are his opinions, not those of the TELECOM moderator), is too large to sumbit to the digest. The file is being made available for FTP from the archive host, SRI-CSL. The file is <TELECOM>COMPUTER.STATE. SRI-CSL accepts the ANONYMOUS login convention for FTP. If you cannot access the ARPANET to ftp this file, send mail to TELECOM-REQUEST@USC-ECLC and I will be happy to forward you a copy by return mail. Cheers, --Jsol ------------------------------ From: pyuxbb!ggr%eagle@BRL-BMD.ARPA Date: Wed, 11-Jan-84 15:53:02 EST From: Guy Riddle <decvax!pyuxbb!ggr@BRL-BMD.ARPA> Subject: Corridors As usual, New Jersey is considered an appendage of New York City or of Philadelphia, but I'll restrain my flaming for now. Two questions for you experts out there: 1) If calls between the North Jersey LATA (most of it) and NYC (212) are handled by New Jersey Bell (and show up on the intra-LATA portion of your bill), who approves the tarriffs for these rates? They are still inter-state, but NJB normally deals with the NJ PUC not the FCC. 2) When the explicit-carrier routing plan gets installed, can a user choose to route these calls via AT&T-C or MCI instead of through NJB? === Guy Riddle == AT&T Bell Laboratories, Piscataway === ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest *********************