telecom@ucbvax.ARPA (11/09/84)
From: Jon Solomon (the Moderator) <Telecom-Request@BBNCCA> TELECOM Digest Thu, 8 Nov 84 18:06:17 EST Volume 4 : Issue 115 Today's Topics: LA BBS Case Wanted: Info on Smart PBX Signalman Mark XII ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 6-Nov-84 16:58:05 PST From: Lauren Weinstein <vortex!lauren@RAND-UNIX.ARPA> Subject: LA BBS Case To: TELECOM@BBNCCA As far as I'm concerned, from currently available information, there are just too many "coincidences" in the case for me to have much (if any) faith in the BBS operator. And in any case, I strongly feel that people must take the initiative to be responsible for the material on their BBS's in the long run. If a message hangs around for a couple of days that's one thing, but for weeks or months? Some people claim that BBS operators should be immune to having any responsibility for what's on their boards, and try to use the USPS and telcos as an example. However, I claim that a much better analogy would be a physical bulletin board in a corporate building, or a newspaper that took classified ads. In both of these cases, any entity that allowed the use of such facilities, over a period of time, for the posting of messages promoting illegal activities would be (and have been found to be) responsible. The fact that the BBS's do not use a physical medium like a wallboard or newspaper does not change the fact that they are subject to the same rules. --Lauren-- ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 7 Nov 84 14:19:01 pst From: jdd@decwrl.ARPA (John DeTreville) To: Telecom@BBNCCA Subject: Wanted: Info on Smart PBX [This may be a repeat article. --JSol] Here's a question for TELECOM readers: Are there any PBXs available that can be configured as servers controlled from some external computer system? Various vendors seem to be offering smart PBX stations that integrate some workstation functions, but they still make better telephones than they do workstations. Instead of taking this approach, you could imagine using real workstations that communicated with the PBX over a LAN , sequencing it through calls, being told of user inputs, etc. The PBX would know how to interface with the telephone environment; the workstations or whatever could concentrate on integrating voice communication into a larger user environment. So, does any vendor offer anything along such lines? Cheers, John ------------------------------ From: hou4b!dwl@Berkeley (d.w.levenson) To: Telecom-Request@BBNCCA Date: 7 Nov 1984 15:41 EST Dialed Number Recorders are provided by a company called Hekimian. They are useful in gathering evidence against Phone-Phreaks, in that they can detect and record DTMF (touch-tone(r)), MF addressing, and SF supervision signalling. I'm no lawyer, but I assume that the telco may connect one to a line at any time they want to. Having its record admitted as evidence in a court of law may be more complicated. -Dave Levenson ------------------------------ Date: 8 Nov 84 17:03:10 EST From: Eric <LAVITSKY@RU-GREEN.ARPA> Subject: Signalman Mark XII To: telecom@BBNCCA.ARPA, info-micro@BRL-VGR.ARPA Hi, I am considering purchasing an Anchor Automation Mark XII modem, but first I need some more information. I have heard that the modem loses in one major respect: it cannot send a break. Is this true, or has it been corrected in later versions? Are there any other major losses with this modem? Does it give off a lot of RFI? Is it sensitive to outside RFI? How does it handle noisy/weak lines? Any other tips/ tidbits of information regarding this modem would be much appreciated. Thanx, Eric ------- ------------------------------ End of TELECOM Digest ******************************