[fa.telecom] Future network dialing plans

goldstein@ALPHA.DEC (10/17/85)

The "blue book" (Notes on the Network, AT&T 1980) lists 260 as the
first "interchangeable" area code, and 480 is second.  NET has used
480 in Marlboro, Mass. for years, so they're not worried.  The
rule is very simple, really -- area codes all begin with a 1 and
intra-area calls don't.  Toll or no toll.  Go to Brooklyn and try
it out (or LA).  

The CO doesn't really know what calls cost.  All they do is record
the dialed number; a computer in the Revenue Accounting Office does
the real work.  It's not quite so simple as it sounds; while 99.9%
of calls are easy to bill, there are very tricky rules surrounding
calls to Mexico, toll stations, intrastate rates, etc., which keep
programmers busy.  In Europe, where pulse metering is the rule, it's
simple to know the rate if you just count the pulses as they come in.
But you don't get detailed billing; you just "trust" the PTT to bill
you correctly.

There _IS_ a "new" telephone network coming, if that's how you view
ISDN (Integrated Services Digital Network).  ISDN will offer digital
connectivity using out-of-band packet signalling (i.e., CCIS-like).
While there are still a number of details to be resolved before the
world standardizes it (this time, they don't want to have to merge
separate networks built before standardization), the working definitions
do provide for useful features like true answer supervision, caller
choice of service when the call is made (i.e., digitized voice, data,
whatever) and calling number ID.  Expect early ISDN deployment late
this decade, with pilots (not using the still-undefined standards)
underway soon.

I'm sure TELECOM DIGEST will have plenty on ISDN in the future...

Fred (@ISDN Program Office, DEC Tewksbury)