[net.video] VCR vs. Video Discs

bwt (12/15/82)

Please excuse me if this has been asked before or if someone thinks this is
a dumb question but I am interested in finding out the differences (pros/cons)
about VCRs and Video Disc Recorders/Players such as reliability, pricing, and
performance comparisons as well as availability of movies for each.  Please
send mail to me and/or reply on the net if you feel it worthwhile to post.
Thanx.


					Barry W. True
					iw2F-315 x7642

michaelk (12/16/82)

Video Discs don't record (unless you are MGA, etc). VCRs do.  This is one
big problem with the discs -- especially with VCR's prices going down
on the low end machines.

Mike Kersenbrock
Aloha, Oregon

mclure (03/09/83)

#R:ihuxn:-19400:sri-unix:7100004:000:1234
sri-unix!mclure    Dec 16 07:12:00 1982

VCR advantages
    you can record
    wide selection of pre-recorded tapes

VCR disadvantages
    generally lousy quality of picture (compared to professional VCR's
       like Umatic)
    tapes decay with time
    tapes are easily damaged
    different formats by different manufacturers
    some work is being done on getting stereo, but for the most part
       the results have been poor.

Video disk advantages
    excellent picture and stereo quality
    almost indestructable media

Video disk disadvantages
    lack of wide selection of pre-recorded disks.
    you can't record
      I expect that recording will become possible within 10 years.
    current video disk players have a hack called extended play
      (1 hour per side) which requires the disabling of many of the
      features: freeze-frame, slow-mo, etc. I expect 1 hour per side
      with features to become available sometime in the next 5 years.
    different formats by different manufacturers

A personal note: I do not intend to buy a video disk player until at
least 1 hour per side with features has been implemented.  50% of my
reason for buying/renting movies is to carefully inspect the various
shots and techniques used by the director.

	Stuart