[net.video] why *NOT* VHS HiFi?

augeri@regina.DEC (12/05/84)

> > Why should I not spend $1100 or so on a VHS-HiFi unit instead?
> > 
> Several reasons:
>
> 1. VHS Hi-Fi is NOT compatible with VHS Stereo.  This means that you won't
> be able to do anything with your friends' tapes or rental tapes other than
> look at the boxes.
>

I believe that the latter statement is incorrect. According to the December
1984 issue of Video magazine (article titled "Hi-Fi Standoff" starting on
p. 106) "To insure compatibility, all VHS Hi-Fi machines can play back
Dolby stereo tapes as well as record split-track stereo in addition to the
Hi-Fi tracks." (pp.  107-108).

I recommend the article. In summary it says that both VHS and Beta Hi-Fi
systems have their anomalies, faults or quirks, but "they're still a
quantum leap beyond the old mono/Dolby stereo tracks of yesteryear..." (p.
184). The article deals mostly with "subjective" reactions rather than
"objective" measurements, which is ok with me since it is what you hear
that really matters. They used a double-blind test procedure where neither
the tester nor the listener knew which system they were hearing until
after the listener had selected the system they thought sounded better. I
own a Sony SL-2700 which I think is a great machine, but I don't think you
can go wrong buying either VHS or Beta.

	Mike

	UUCP: decvax!decwrl!rhea!regina!augeri
	ARPA: decwrl!rhea!regina!augeri@SU-Shasta