[comp.human-factors] customization vs. adaptation

sandy@snoopy.cs.umass.edu (& Wise) (06/19/91)

In article <1991Jun19.095117.19080@cs.ruu.nl> rloon@praxis.cs.ruu.nl (Ronald van Loon) writes:

 >  It seems to me that an adaptive interface is just a special case of
 >  a customizable interface.

This depends on what you mean by adaptation and customization.
Customization for me means the ability to make presentation level
changes to the interface.  If adaptation means automatically
changing the appearance of the interface (e.g., some menu systems were
designed to move the users frequently selected menu choices to the
top) then adaptive interfaces are a subset of customizable ones.

However, if an adaptive interface is one that recognizes user actions
and alters its behavior instead of its presentation (e.g., the CMU
Gandalf system can recognize recuring user patterns and automatically
record them as a script.  When it detects the user beginning the
pattern again, it automatically invokes the script to finish the
action, or I3R, a document retreival system that uses which documents
you have selected or rejected to narrow the search) then they are
disjoint.

        /s
--
Alexander Erskine Wise /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ Software Development Laboratory
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ WISE@CS.UMASS.EDU /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\ This situation calls for large amounts of unadulterated CHOCOLATE! /\/\/\