[misc.activism.progressive] "Environmental Disaster" in Mexico

harelb@cabot.dartmouth.edu (Harel Barzilai) (06/18/91)

    "The region [...] has become a dumping ground for toxic waste and
    pesticides by multinational corporations whose actions are rarely
    monitored by Mexico's cash-strapped environmental agency [...] an
    official acknowledged [..] that only about 35 per cent of the
    U.S.-owned factories along the 3,200 kilometre border were
    believed to be complying with Mexican environmental laws covering
    their operations and their disposal of toxic waste."

    "The maquiladoras have thrived on Mexico's low labour costs to 
    become the most dynamic part of its manufacturing sector.  Mexican 
    officials expect them to continue expanding as the two countries 
    eliminate trade barriers and push for increased border 
    industrialization."
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Topic 43        Mexican environmental disaster 
hfrederick      carnet.mexnews   4:07 pm  May 10, 1991 
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
Cc: econet 
Subject: Mexican environmental disaster 
From: "D. S. Shniad" <USERNQRW%SFU.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU> 
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

        Mexico City -- The U.S.-Mexico border region, plagued by 
    uncontrolled growth and unrelenting pollution, is fast becoming an 
    environmental disaster zone, experts say. 
        The once-desolate region is now home to some 2,000 
    maquiladoras -- foreign-owned manufacturing and assembly plants 
    -- on the Mexican side of the border. 
        "The border region cannot survive this beating," says  Homero 
    Aridjis, president of the Group of 100, an influential Mexican 
    environmental organization. 
        "Multinationals are turning a desert with limited water and 
    other resources into an industrial centre without thinking about 
    tomorrow." 
        The region, called a "virtual cesspool" in a report last year 
    by the American Medical Association, has become a dumping ground 
    for toxic waste  and pesticides by multinational corporations 
    whose actions are rarely monitored by Mexico's cash-strapped 
    environmental agency, according to environmentalists. 
        Rene Altamirano, an official of the agency -- known as SEDUE 
    -- acknowledged in remarks at a recent border trade conference 
    that only about 35 per cent of the U.S.-owned factories along the 
    3,200 kilometre border were believed to be complying with Mexican 
    environmental laws covering their operations and their disposal of 
    toxic waste. 
        "We just don't have the resources to track down all those who 
    are violating the laws," Altamirano said. 
        The maquiladoras have thrived on Mexico's low labour costs to 
    become the most dynamic part of its manufacturing sector.  Mexican 
    officials expect them to continue expanding as the two countries 
    eliminate trade barriers and push for increased border 
    industrialization. 
        The proposed free trade accord between Canada, the U.S. and 
    Mexico, which could take effect by 1993, would further encourage 
    growth on the Mexican side of the border. 
        "What is now a danger zone would become an environmental war 
    zone," Aridjis says. 
        Environmental and labour groups say they have documented 
    dozens of environmental abuses by major U.S. companies -- 
    including the dumping of toxic chemicals into rivers used for 
    drinking water and fishing, illegal disposal of hazardous waste 
    and constant spewing of dangerous chemicals from plants. 
        The critics say the population in the border region, which 
    lacks a sufficient sewage system and suffers chronic water 
    shortages, has doubled in the last decade. 
        Maquiladora officials gathered at a recent conference in 
    Mexico City privately acknowledged that lax enforcement of Mexican 
    laws was a selling point for U.S. companies looking to expand and 
    cut costs. 
 
                                 --Reuters