[misc.activism.progressive] STATEMENT FROM SLOVENIA

christic@igc.org (06/29/91)

/* Written  6:38 pm  Jun 28, 1991 by warresisters in cdp:pn.alerts */
/* ---------- "STATEMENT FROM SLOVENIA" ---------- */
Posted by War Resisters' International on behalf of the Centre for
the Culture of Peace and Nonviolence, Mestni trg 13, 61000 Ljubljana
SLOVENIA (Tel +386 1 224666)

To all friends of the peace movement on the planet:

Re aggression in Slovenia (Message 3, 28 June 1991)

[note from WRI: we haven't been sent messages 1 and 2, but will post
them if they do exist and relate to the current aggression]

Dear friends,

For years we kept in touch and tried to inform and warn you about
the situation in Yugoslavia -- first the violations of human rights,
later about state violence in Kosovo; and over the past few years
about the threats made by the federal state against Slovenian
sovereignties.

What everybody feared did happen yesterday. The federal government
had ordered the federal military to invade Slovenia and take the
power from the hands of the legitimate Slovenian authorities. The
federal military is using all means of aggression including bombing
and threats of chemical weapons. Slovenia found itself in a war.
Most of the borders are closed. Many people -- soldiers and
civilians -- have died, including some foreign reporters.

We have never judged the decision of the Slovenian people to form
their own state. But we have always judged the process, qualities,
and motivations accompanying these decisions. And again we have had
criticism of official Slovenian behaviour. The peace movement in
Slovenia had for years been concentrating all its efforts on:

* promoting peace politics in Slovenia in its dispute with the
Yugoslav state, especially to maintain good communications with the
other Yugoslav republics.

* stimulate foreign policy to engage seriously in the Yugoslav
crisis and to enable mechanisms for nonviolent conflict resolution.

Neither of the two was successful. We are of the opinion that
Slovenian policy could be much more wise; in particular we have
criticisms of its one-sided measures concerning foreign policy and
defence policy. We were always of the opinion that _military logic
and military preparations can never lead to constructive solutions_.
We did warn the Slovenian government that the formation of a
Slovenian army could lead to crisis, and we suggested alternative
mechanisms. Despite our dissatisfaction we have to underline that
Slovenian policy did not take any violent measure against any party.
Our criticism of the Slovenian government does not and cannot offer
any apologia for the three factors which in our view contributed
largely to the military occupation by the Yugoslav state in
Slovenia.

1. The militaristic and centralistic policy of the federal state,
led by prime minister Ante Markovic, which proved in all cases of
widespread conflict in Yugoslavia that the federal state is ready to
defend the status quo with the most brutal methods and violations of
human rights. The federal government ordered the intervention of the
federal military and is fully responsible for the casualties and
damage caused.

2. International politics, which in our view gave Markovic full
justification to use the military against Slovenia, by supporting
the Yugoslav state and not allowing any option of independence for
the northern republics. The foreign public did not want to
understand that the individual republics in Yugoslavia have the
constitutional right of self-determination and did not understand
that the rigid socialist power-holders in Belgrade want to maintain
full and centralised power over the whole state.

3. The failure of the mechanisms of the UN and CSCE to act before
the conflict evolved into a violent crisis. Moreover, the secretary
general of the UN made a statement today expressing his "inability
to _make any comment_ on the situation in Yugoslavia, since this was
an internal problem of Yugoslavia".

The international policies of the USA and EC in our view bear the
whole responsibility for the violence of the military in Slovenia.
The peace movement should be aware of this fact and we are sorry to
be drawn into a position where we have to put it in such a hard way.
Once again, following the Gulf War, international policy has
failed -- despite the fact that it has been warned so many times
about the worsening situation in the country. All the world knew
about the possible scenarios in Yugoslavia and it did not find
enough consideration to make a serious move to prevent violence. How
many people must die for the world to make a stand against violent
and mad regimes?

We ask you to:

* interpret the events in Slovenia as a military intervention in a
sovereign state and not as a civil war

* make pressure on your governments to denounce the military
intervention of the federal government, request a ceasefire and the
beginning of negotiations

* request European governments to activate CSCE mechanisms for
conflict resolution

* express criticism to the UN and make pressure on the Security
Council to activate its mechanisms for a peaceful solution of the
conflict, and to initiate a peace conference under the auspices of
the UN.

The first step must be a ceasefire and a freeze on all further
military activity by the Yugoslav and Slovenian authorities. The
next step is to provide mechanisms and conditions for negotiations.
International politics should not judge the form of the state(s) in
the Balkans, but insist instead on a fair and nonviolent decision-
making process by the parties involved.

This time, this is of course an extremely urgent appeal, and we ask
you to do your best to spread the information and keep in touch with
us.

Yours in peace,

Marko Hren

Please keep in touch and await an issue of the _Intruder_  (formerly
_Independent Voices_) very soon.