das15@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Douglas A Scott) (05/31/91)
Could someone tell me the relationship between the 2.6 source in the stanford archive and the 13-odd fixes that are also there? I gather that most if not all of those fixes have *not* been applied to the archived source. Are the fixes all "approved", i.e., has it been shown that they all repair proven bugs? If this is old news, please just send me some email. Thanks! <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Douglas Scott Columbia University Computer Music Studio Internet: <doug@woof.columbia.edu> <das15@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu> UUCP: ...!columbia!woof!zardoz!doug Phone: (703)765-4771