circadia@leland.Stanford.EDU (Russell Neil Van Gelder) (04/01/91)
My query: is something wrong with my news server? I have been subscribed to the newsgroup for the better part of a week, but so far, no news... Russ
slehar@park.bu.edu (Steve Lehar) (04/01/91)
Well the newsgroup just popped up on my system with your posting as the very first, so I read you loud and clear. -- (O)((O))(((O)))((((O))))(((((O)))))(((((O)))))((((O))))(((O)))((O))(O) (O)((O))((( slehar@park.bu.edu )))((O))(O) (O)((O))((( Steve Lehar Boston University Boston MA )))((O))(O) (O)((O))((( (617) 424-7035 (H) (617) 353-6741 (W) )))((O))(O) (O)((O))(((O)))((((O))))(((((O)))))(((((O)))))((((O))))(((O)))((O))(O)
jfa0522@hertz.njit.edu (john f andrews ece) (04/01/91)
Hmmm... just appeared here, too. But I must say I am glad to see it.
-=john
PS: Anybody into neuro imaging?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
john f andrews SYSOP The Biomedical Engineering BBS
24 hrs 300/1200/2400/4800 (201) 596-5679
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNET jfa0522@hertz.njit.edu CIS 73710,2600
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------mathew@jane.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Mathew Yeates) (04/02/91)
> >PS: Anybody into neuro imaging? > >----------------------------------------------------------------------------- now that you mention it .... How can I tell from a CT how much damage has been done to the brain of an aneurism patient. What do I look for? Also, what are the relative merits of CT, PET, SPECT and MRI? Can anything important be learned besides what is available in a CT? Finally, can the patients prospect for a recovery be determined from any of the above tests? (the patient is a relative) Thanks Mathew Yeates mathew@jane.jpl.nasa.gov
efong@teri.bio.uci.edu (Eugene Fong) (04/03/91)
In article <1991Apr2.062447.1876@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>, mathew@jane.Jpl.Nasa.Gov (Mathew Yeates) writes: |> > |> >PS: Anybody into neuro imaging? |> > |> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |> |> now that you mention it .... |> |> How can I tell from a CT how much damage has been done to the brain of |> an aneurism patient. What do I look for? |> |> Also, what are the relative merits of CT, PET, SPECT and MRI? Can |> anything important be learned besides what is available in a CT? |> |> Finally, can the patients prospect for a recovery be determined from |> any of the above tests? (the patient is a relative) |> |> Thanks |> |> Mathew Yeates |> mathew@jane.jpl.nasa.gov Speaking about imaging does anyone do quantitative measures of brain volume from MRI scans. This would be very useful in noting the amount of atrophy present -- Eugene Fong
kristoff@genbank.bio.net (David Kristofferson) (04/03/91)
> My query: is something wrong with my news server? I have been > subscribed to the newsgroup for the better part of a week, but so > far, no news... > > Russ We maintain the bionet USENET groups and can explain the situation above. The bionet groups are a combination of USENET distributions and e-mail lists at four different sites. The newsgroups were put into place a week or so ago but the mailing lists still have not been implemented at two sites in Europe. I expect that this will happen by Thursday of this week and apologize for the delay. At that time the group discussion leader will post an official welcome here and an announcement will be made on bionet.general. Until that time you will not create any problems by posting to bionet.neuroscience, but messages posted before the official opening will not be distributed to all of our e-mail subscribers. Sincerely, Dave Kristofferson GenBank Manager kristoff@genbank.bio.net
kristoff@genbank.bio.net (David Kristofferson) (04/13/91)
The bionet.neuroscience newsgroup and accompanying e-mail lists should now be functional. This is a final test. Sincerely, Dave Kristofferson GenBank Manager kristoff@genbank.bio.net
usenet@nlm.nih.gov (usenet news poster) (04/13/91)
Yet another test of the USENET distribution of the newgroup. Please ignore.