murphyn@motcid.UUCP (Neal P. Murphy) (02/14/91)
bbh@mtek.com (Bud Hovell @ Mtek) and clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca (Chris Lewis) write: < Some very agreeable stuff. > One question is, Has the experiment finished? If it has, then has a new one started? Is Charlie working in collusion with Mikie? Why haven't we seen the results of that experiment? If the experiment hasn't finished, why hasn't it? If it was a real experiment, it was unethical and Mikie should have any licenses yanked (if he is a doctor, I personally doubt it) and should be fired. Perhaps one can experiment on mice, or chimps, or plants. Experimenting on humans with the subjects' prior consent is *obviously* done, but quite wrong. NPN
rjg@umnstat.uucp (Robert J. Granvin) (02/16/91)
>One question is, Has the experiment finished? If it has, then has a new one >started? Is Charlie working in collusion with Mikie? Why haven't we seen >the results of that experiment? >If the experiment hasn't finished, why hasn't it? All I'm interested in, is why I've not received any answers to my posted questions or to my email'ed requests. (When mail goes from internet site to internet site, I'm fairly certain it was received :-) So far, just static. Robert J. Granvin E/Mail: rjg@umnstat.stat.umn.edu User Services Specialist AT&T: +1 612 625 9224 School of Statistics University of Minnesota