dettmer@jupiter.informatik.uni-dortmund.de (Thomas Dettmer) (02/25/91)
Hello, a question which may also be interesting the VASG: Doing some implementations with VHDL, I found it very useful to have the concept of differing architectures for one entity available - not only for differing design levels, but also to hide differing algorithms on the same abstraction level. Now, what about package bodies? They are separated nicely, but I'd prefer to have multiple (named) implementations of package bodies. One possible concept would be, to have several named package bodies for one package available and a configuration for each use clause. Are there any plans/ideas for the reballoting 1992? Possibly I simply did not get the philosophy of VHDL here and this makes no sense? But I think in practice it could be useful - especially if we use VHDL not only to model our design, but also for some (mechanical...) environment. tom. dettmer@jupiter.ls1.informatik.uni-dortmund.de phone: +49-231 755 4825, FAX: +49-231 755 2386 Thomas Dettmer, Dortmund University, Computer Science I Post Box 50 05 00, W-4600 Dortmund 50, Germany