hjanssen@cbnewse.att.com (hank janssen) (02/06/91)
I just keep on asking, Could anybody tell me what the best monitor to use for graphical applications, i expect something like a multisync monitor with a flickerfixer.?? But than the question what monitor with what flickerfixer. Any ideas or suggestions.??? Thanx, Hank Janssen System Programmer. AT&T International. att!ihlpb!hjanssen
jma@beach.cis.ufl.edu (John 'Vlad' Adams) (02/07/91)
For the interlace board, I'd go with the Commodore board without any doubt. Cheaper and better than the Microway. For the monitor, I'd go with either the Princeton UltraSync or the NEC 3D. -- John M. Adams --***-- Professional Student /// Internet: jma@beach.cis.ufl.edu Genie: vlad /// Only the Amiga Sysop of The Beachside, Amiga BBS, Paragon 2.085 \\V// Makes it Possible Fido Net 1:3612/557. 904-492-2305 (Florida) \X/
darrell@comspec.uucp (Darrell Grainger) (02/13/91)
In article <26742@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU>, jma@beach.cis.ufl.edu (John 'Vlad' Adams) writes: > For the interlace board, I'd go with the Commodore board > without any doubt. Cheaper and better than the Microway. > > For the monitor, I'd go with either the Princeton UltraSync > or the NEC 3D. > -- With a lot of the new resolution of AmigaDOS 2.0 I would say that the Nec 3D is not the best choice. I did not get the model number but saw someone with a really nice Zenith monitor. It had the nice feature of no border and autosized to the changing resolutions. Darrell Grainger
huebner@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Robert E. Huebner) (02/14/91)
In article <1991Feb13.000003.21204@comspec.uucp> darrell@comspec.uucp (Darrell Grainger) writes: >In article <26742@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU>, jma@beach.cis.ufl.edu (John 'Vlad' Adams) writes: >> For the interlace board, I'd go with the Commodore board >> without any doubt. Cheaper and better than the Microway. >> >> For the monitor, I'd go with either the Princeton UltraSync >> or the NEC 3D. >> -- > > With a lot of the new resolution of AmigaDOS 2.0 I would say that the Nec 3D >is not the best choice. I did not get the model number but saw someone with a >really nice Zenith monitor. It had the nice feature of no border and autosized >to the changing resolutions. Also, in a past post regarding technical specifications for the A2410 (ULowell) card, it was stated that a Nec4D-type monitor would be needed to access all the display resolutions available from the TIGA board. Particularly I think it was stated that the 1024x1024x8 mode required a sync rate the 3D is incapable of. Something to think aobut if you plan to upgrade to Amiga UNIX (and have far too much disposable income) -- | Robert E. Huebner | "Death is nature's way of telling | | huebner@en.ecn.purdue.edu | you to slow down" | | huebner@aerospace.aero.org | - Unknown Author |
etxtomp@eos.ericsson.se (Tommy Petersson) (02/16/91)
In article <1991Feb13.000003.21204@comspec.uucp> darrell@comspec.uucp (Darrell Grainger) writes: >In article <26742@uflorida.cis.ufl.EDU>, jma@beach.cis.ufl.edu (John 'Vlad' Adams) writes: >> For the interlace board, I'd go with the Commodore board >> without any doubt. Cheaper and better than the Microway. >> >> For the monitor, I'd go with either the Princeton UltraSync >> or the NEC 3D. >> -- > > With a lot of the new resolution of AmigaDOS 2.0 I would say that the Nec 3D >is not the best choice. I did not get the model number but saw someone with a >really nice Zenith monitor. It had the nice feature of no border and autosized >to the changing resolutions. > >Darrell Grainger Can anyone recommend a colour monitor that goes well with the capabilities of the ULowell 1024x1024 256/24 bit palette? It doesn't have to be that extremely large, 16"-17" could be enough. Tommy Petersson etxtomp@eos.ericsson.se