[comp.sys.amiga.applications] Maple?

ppalmer@oskar.uchicago.edu (Patrick Palmer) (04/13/91)

I have pretty decided to buying Maple.  I wrote and got the full
package of material (reviews and comparisons with other packages as
well as lots of details about use of the package).  I have two
questions which I hope users can answer:

1. What version is now available for the Amiga?  After 90 days
upgrades cost 60% of the full price, and since 5.0 for the Amiga has
been "soon" for a long time, it seems like a safer idea to wait until
they actually release rather than guess that it will be within 90
days.

2. I plan to use it on an un-accelerated A2000.  Is that in fact tolerable?

Pat Palmer (email: ppalmer@oskar.uchicago.edu)

es1@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Ethan Solomita) (04/13/91)

In article <1991Apr12.232054.10840@midway.uchicago.edu> ppalmer@oskar.uchicago.edu (Patrick Palmer) writes:
>I have pretty decided to buying Maple.  I wrote and got the full
>package of material (reviews and comparisons with other packages as
>well as lots of details about use of the package).  I have two
>questions which I hope users can answer:
>
>1. What version is now available for the Amiga?  After 90 days
>upgrades cost 60% of the full price, and since 5.0 for the Amiga has
>been "soon" for a long time, it seems like a safer idea to wait until
>they actually release rather than guess that it will be within 90
>days.
>
	Anyone who buys after Jan 1, i.e. you, will get a free
upgrade when it comes out.

>2. I plan to use it on an un-accelerated A2000.  Is that in fact tolerable?
>
	It is very fast on my A3000 and it should be at least
acceptable on the 2000.

>Pat Palmer (email: ppalmer@oskar.uchicago.edu)


	-- Ethan

Q: How many Comp Sci majors does it take to change a lightbulb
A: None. It's a hardware problem.

hb136@leah.albany.edu (Herb Brown) (04/13/91)

In article <1991Apr12.232054.10840@midway.uchicago.edu> ppalmer@oskar.uchicago.edu (Patrick Palmer) writes:
>I have pretty decided to buying Maple.  I wrote and got the full
>package of material (reviews and comparisons with other packages as
>well as lots of details about use of the package).  I have two
>questions which I hope users can answer:
>
>1. What version is now available for the Amiga?  After 90 days
>upgrades cost 60% of the full price, and since 5.0 for the Amiga has
>been "soon" for a long time, it seems like a safer idea to wait until
>they actually release rather than guess that it will be within 90
>days.
>

Version V is currently being beta-tested and looks quite good. I run it on
a 3000 under kickstart version 37.74 and WB2.xx version 37.33.
Of course, Maple 4.2 *is* available, but lacks three-dimensional 'goodies'.
We use Maple 4.2 in our Amiga Classroom.

>2. I plan to use it on an un-accelerated A2000.  Is that in fact tolerable?
>

Yes, Maple 4.2 runs quite well on a 2000hd, for example. Our Classroom uses
2000hd's and we successfully use Maple. Expect it to be slower than on the
A2500, but it certainly works.

P.S. Maple V also runs well on the A2500 under the appropriate versions of
kickstart and WB2.xx.

>Pat Palmer (email: ppalmer@oskar.uchicago.edu)

                                  Herb


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Herb Brown  Math Dept  The Univ at Albany  Albany, NY 12222  (518) 442-4640
hibrown@leah.albany.edu or hibrown@cssun.albany.edu or hibrown@bst.albany.edu
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

gwalborn@unix.cis.pitt.edu (Gary D Walborn) (04/14/91)

I have recently purchased Amiga Maple, Version 4.2.   The Waterloo people
promised that I would receive Version 5 free of charge as soon as it became
available.  My major hesitation in purchasing Maple was the upgrade policy.
As I understand it, the single user license provides updates and technical
support for a year.  After that you have to re-purchase the software.  I
will probably plan on using Version 5 for some time!  Version 4.2 is nice,
but is no speed demon on a 25MHz 3000!  Be prepared to wait for some functions!
I looked at Mathematica (I have an AMAX), but I found Maple easier to use.
Good Luck!

Gary Walborn <gwalborn@cs.pitt.edu>

rlcarr@athena.mit.edu (Richard L. Carreiro) (04/15/91)

In article <1991Apr12.232054.10840@midway.uchicago.edu> ppalmer@oskar.uchicago.edu (Patrick Palmer) writes:
>1. What version is now available for the Amiga?  After 90 days
>upgrades cost 60% of the full price, and since 5.0 for the Amiga has
>been "soon" for a long time, it seems like a safer idea to wait until
>they actually release rather than guess that it will be within 90
>days

Maple 4.2 is currently avail for AmigaDOS.  However, Maple is currently
guaranteeing a *FREE* upgrade to 5.0 no matter how long it takes
to get it out the door.  This is what I have been told in correspondance
with people from Maple.

A potential problem is that Maple V may only work with AmigaDOS 2.0.
Maple says they are working hard on making it work with both 1.3 and 2.0,
but it may not be possible.

--
Rich Carreiro                                    "My country, right or wrong,"
ARPA: rlcarr@athena.mit.edu                                is like
UUCP: ...!mit-eddie!mit-athena!rlcarr            "My driver, sober or drunk."
BITNET: rlcarr@athena.mit.edu      JITTLOV FOREVER!