x194@cs.utexas.edu (Jonathan Abbey) (01/11/91)
You know, it seems that this newsgroup would more rightly have been named comp.sys.amiga.eternal.flame... But I have to admire the valiant sacrifice made by this noble newsgroup in keeping it out of comp.sys.amiga.misc.! 8-)
peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) (01/19/91)
In article <694@tronsbox.xei.com> tron1@tronsbox.xei.com (Kenneth Jamieson) writes: > Just as a point, will ANY discussion of Amiga abilities and > futures be relegated to the "riot" of unreasonable flaming in > .advocacy???? I happen to feel that these topics deserve a little > better than that. Actually, the name-calling in c.s.a.advocacy has been pretty minimal. Despite the intentions of some folks, it's been a pretty orderly place so far... the Marc Barret flames (which he has been abstaining from!) are about the only exception. On the other hand a separate "futures" groups would probably be a good idea. Someone else suggested that a "comp.sys.amiga.os" might be worth looking into... -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' <peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>.