torrie@cs.stanford.edu (Evan Torrie) (06/27/91)
peter@Sugar.NeoSoft.com (Peter da Silva) writes: >In article <1991Jun25.053133.671@neon.Stanford.EDU> torrie@cs.stanford.edu (Evan Torrie) writes: >> Geez. I didn't think the CBM Pet, or the C-64 had multitasking. Guess >> Commodore screwed up royally on those, huh? >No argument from me. I'm an old Atari hand (and the Atari 800 operating system >was in many ways superior to TOS and MS-DOS, though Apple's PRODOS was a bit >nicer)... I didn't think the Atari 800 OS had multitasking either :-) >Sometimes you need a revolution to make progress. Thomas Jefferson believed >a nation should have a revolution at least every 70 years. Computers need >more frequent housecleaning. I agree. The Amiga is almost 6 years old. The Mac is 7 1/2. Which company will be the first to bring out their revolutionary replacement? My money's on Apple. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Evan Torrie. Stanford University, Class of 199? torrie@cs.stanford.edu Murphy's Law of Intelism: Just when you thought Intel had done everything possible to pervert the course of computer architecture, they bring out the 860