xanthian@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Kent Paul Dolan) (01/19/91)
higgin@cbmvax.commodore.com (Paul Higginbottom - CATS) writes: >cseaman@sequent.UUCP (Chris "The Bartman" Seaman) writes: >> This leads to the following question. Given that the feature list for >> 2.0 is (or should be) frozen, and the current revisions are bug >> fixes, is there any likelyhood that Commodore has already taken steps >> such as finalizing documentation, packaging, etc.? I know this sounds >> like the typical "When will 2.0 be out for the 2000?" type of >> question, but what I am really asking is, what kind of lag time would >> there be from the date that 2.0 is burned into ROM, and actually >> seeing it on my dealer's shelves (so to speak)? > Please follow-up in comp.sys.amiga.misc. Better yet, to comp.sys.amiga.advocacy; a provocative subject and a long running, opinionated thread are broad hints that the subject matter has become (and probably alwyas was) appropriate for .advocacy and nowhere else. Moreover, rants against Commodore's marketing, advertising policy, etc., are explicitly included _in_ the .advocacy charter, by design. We renamed .market to .marketplace during the CFD period just so that it would be clear that "market" wasn't short for "marketing". This is a great place for personal Amiga hardware and software ads (and _please_ put them here _only_) and "where can I find X, how much will it cost" discussions, but not the place for berating CBM's sales force. Sigh. I am doomed to become the official grump of c.s.a.*. /// It's Amiga /// for me: why Kent, the man from xanth. \\\/// settle for <xanthian@Zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <xanthian@well.sf.ca.us> \XX/ anything less? -- Convener, COMPLETED comp.sys.amiga grand reorganization.