[net.followup] "Why not net.dr.spock?"

steve (09/02/82)

If the network can tolerate some of the trash that's currently being
passed along our limited bandwidth, I see absolutely no reason why
we can't have a net.dr.spock.  I surely wouldn't subscribe to it,
but just because somebody hates kids and/or listening to parents
rave about their kids (I fall into the latter category) is not
justification to snuff the newsgroup.  (I have no use for about
90% of the newsgroups on this network.  Does that mean we kill them?
No!  It means I don't subscribe to them.)

		hcr!steve