[comp.sys.amiga.datacomm] Is there a 9600 baud standard?

acyoung@lynx.cat.syr.edu (Aaron C. Young) (05/04/91)

Is there a 9600 baud standard?  I see all this stuff about V.32 and V.this
and V.that.  If I buy a 9600 baud modem....can I call any other modem?  I've
got a 2400 baud....and I used to think that was fast.....but now...I think
I really need to get something faster.  So what's the deal?

Thanks,

acyoung@sunrise.acs.syr.edu

bobl@graphics.rent.com (Bob Lindabury - SysAdm) (05/05/91)

acyoung@lynx.cat.syr.edu (Aaron C. Young) writes:

> Is there a 9600 baud standard?  I see all this stuff about V.32 and V.this
> and V.that.  If I buy a 9600 baud modem....can I call any other modem?  I've
> got a 2400 baud....and I used to think that was fast.....but now...I think
> I really need to get something faster.  So what's the deal?

The standard in the entire industry and the world for 9600 bps modems
is V.32.  V.32bis will probably supercede V.32 in the next year.
V.32 gives you a 9600 baud carrier with compression giving you up to
4 times that speed in theory.  V.32bis will give you a 14,400 baud
carrier with the same 4 times increase (theoretically) with
compression.

Right now there are several V.32 modems being manufactured by the
likes of Intel and Practical Peripherals selling for around $400.00.
These will most likely come with upgrade policies to V.32bis.  I
picked up a Hayes Ultra V.32 and hope to upgrade to V.32bis soon.

> Thanks,

Your welcome.
 
> acyoung@sunrise.acs.syr.edu

-- Bob

 The Graphics BBS  908/469-0049  "It's better than a sharp stick in the eye!"
 ============================================================================
  InterNet: bobl@graphics.rent.com                | Raven Enterprises
      UUCP: ...rutgers!bobsbox!graphics!bobl      | 25 Raven Avenue
    BitNet: bobl%graphics.rent.com@pucc           | Piscataway, NJ 08854
    Home #: 908/560-7353                          | 908/271-8878

jseymour@medar.com (James Seymour) (05/06/91)

In article <NF6g22w164w@graphics.rent.com> bobl@graphics.rent.com (Bob Lindabury - SysAdm) writes:
>acyoung@lynx.cat.syr.edu (Aaron C. Young) writes:
>
>> Is there a 9600 baud standard?  I see all this stuff about V.32 and V.this
>> and V.that.  If I buy a 9600 baud modem....can I call any other modem?  I've
>> got a 2400 baud....and I used to think that was fast.....but now...I think
>> I really need to get something faster.  So what's the deal?
>
>The standard in the entire industry and the world for 9600 bps modems
>is V.32.  V.32bis will probably supercede V.32 in the next year.
>V.32 gives you a 9600 baud carrier with compression giving you up to
>4 times that speed in theory.  V.32bis will give you a 14,400 baud
>carrier with the same 4 times increase (theoretically) with
>compression.
>

This is not correct.  v.32 is the CCITT standard for 9600bps modems, but
does no compression, etc.  Any compression or error checking/correcting
is performed by a protocol running "on top of" v.32.  The current CCITT
standards for this are v.42 and v.42bis.  v.42 specifies error correcting
protocol negotiation and v.42bis adds compression.  Where Bob is confused
is that (at least as far as I have seen) all new 9600bps v.32 modems
include v.42bis.  You can, for instance, run a modem at 2400bps and still
use v.42bis to get the compression.

>Right now there are several V.32 modems being manufactured by the
>likes of Intel and Practical Peripherals selling for around $400.00.
>These will most likely come with upgrade policies to V.32bis.  I
>picked up a Hayes Ultra V.32 and hope to upgrade to V.32bis soon.
>

BEWARE!!!  v.32bis is sufficiently different from v.32 that upgrading a
v.32 modem to v.32bis is by no means a given.  From what I've been
reading, not all of the modem manufacturers are being real clear about
this.

If you really want the lowdown, I suggest some time spent in
comp.dcom.modems.  If your site has been getting this in it's newsfeed,
and the article has not yet been expired there, look for something
entitled like "lexicon".  It is kind of a monthly FAQ posting on
modem alphabet soup and explains all of this stuff in pretty good
detail.  If you can't find it, let me know and I will mail it to you.
I also wrote up my own standard answer to questions like this that is
much more brief.  I would be happy to send it along as well.

-- 
Jim Seymour				| Medar, Inc.
...!uunet!medar!jseymour		| 38700 Grand River Ave.
jseymour@medar.com			| Farmington Hills, MI. 48331
CIS: 72730,1166  GEnie: jseymour	| FAX: (313)477-8897

bobl@graphics.rent.com (Bob Lindabury - SysAdm) (05/07/91)

jseymour@medar.com (James Seymour) writes:

> >The standard in the entire industry and the world for 9600 bps modems
> >is V.32.  V.32bis will probably supercede V.32 in the next year.
> >V.32 gives you a 9600 baud carrier with compression giving you up to
> >4 times that speed in theory.  V.32bis will give you a 14,400 baud
> >carrier with the same 4 times increase (theoretically) with
> >compression.
> >
> 
> This is not correct.  v.32 is the CCITT standard for 9600bps modems, but
> does no compression, etc.  Any compression or error checking/correcting
> is performed by a protocol running "on top of" v.32.  The current CCITT
> standards for this are v.42 and v.42bis.  v.42 specifies error correcting
> protocol negotiation and v.42bis adds compression.  Where Bob is confused
> is that (at least as far as I have seen) all new 9600bps v.32 modems
> include v.42bis.  You can, for instance, run a modem at 2400bps and still
> use v.42bis to get the compression.

Again, I didn't meant to infer that compression came with V.32 or
V.32bis.  I was just stating that with different compression schemes,
you could get higher throughput rates.
 
> >Right now there are several V.32 modems being manufactured by the
> >likes of Intel and Practical Peripherals selling for around $400.00.
> >These will most likely come with upgrade policies to V.32bis.  I
> >picked up a Hayes Ultra V.32 and hope to upgrade to V.32bis soon.
> >
> 
> BEWARE!!!  v.32bis is sufficiently different from v.32 that upgrading a
> v.32 modem to v.32bis is by no means a given.  From what I've been
> reading, not all of the modem manufacturers are being real clear about
> this.

Actually, Hayes is being real clear about it.  They *will* be
offering an affordable upgrade solution to Ultra owners.
 
> If you really want the lowdown, I suggest some time spent in
> comp.dcom.modems.  If your site has been getting this in it's newsfeed,
> and the article has not yet been expired there, look for something
> entitled like "lexicon".  It is kind of a monthly FAQ posting on
> modem alphabet soup and explains all of this stuff in pretty good
> detail.  If you can't find it, let me know and I will mail it to you.
> I also wrote up my own standard answer to questions like this that is
> much more brief.  I would be happy to send it along as well.

Here here!  comp.dcom.modems is the place to get the goods on all
this stuff.

-- Bob

 The Graphics BBS  908/469-0049  "It's better than a sharp stick in the eye!"
 ============================================================================
  InterNet: bobl@graphics.rent.com                | Raven Enterprises
      UUCP: ...rutgers!bobsbox!graphics!bobl      | 25 Raven Avenue
    BitNet: bobl%graphics.rent.com@pucc           | Piscataway, NJ 08854
    Home #: 908/560-7353                          | 908/271-8878