barrett@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU (Dan Barrett) (06/18/91)
In article <VINSCI.91Jun18044538@nic.nic.funet.fi> vinsci@nic.funet.fi (Leonard Norrgard) writes: >... why don't amiga autodocs specify what files you must *include* for >FooBar() to work? I agree -- is this fixed in the 2.0 RKM's? I've heard they are significantly updated and improved. Dan //////////////////////////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ | Dan Barrett, Department of Computer Science Johns Hopkins University | | INTERNET: barrett@cs.jhu.edu | | | COMPUSERVE: >internet:barrett@cs.jhu.edu | UUCP: barrett@jhunix.UUCP | \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/////////////////////////////////////
ricci@cbmvax.commodore.com (Mark Ricci - CATS) (06/19/91)
In article <8739@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU> barrett@jhunix.HCF.JHU.EDU (Dan Barrett) writes: >In article <VINSCI.91Jun18044538@nic.nic.funet.fi> vinsci@nic.funet.fi (Leonard Norrgard) writes: >>... why don't amiga autodocs specify what files you must *include* for >>FooBar() to work? > > I agree -- is this fixed in the 2.0 RKM's? I've heard they are >significantly updated and improved. > In the 2.0 Devices manual, each device and resource chapter lists the names of its include files and autodocs on the last page of the chapter. -- ============================================================================= Mark Ricci - CATS | "I don't think so! Homey don't play dat." Commodore Applications and | Technical Support | - Homey the Clown ricci@cbmvax.commodore.com | In Living Color ==============================================================================