[comp.sys.amiga.misc] Does Commodore really want to sell WB2.0?

higgin@cbmvax.commodore.com (Paul Higginbottom - CATS) (01/18/91)

In article <50784@sequent.UUCP> cseaman@sequent.UUCP (Chris "The Bartman" Seaman) writes:
$This leads to the following question.  Given that the feature list for
$2.0 is (or should be) frozen, and the current revisions are bug fixes,
$is there any likelyhood that Commodore has already taken steps such as
$finalizing documentation, packaging, etc.?  I know this sounds like the
$typical "When will 2.0 be out for the 2000?" type of question, but what
$I am really asking is, what kind of lag time would there be from the
$date that 2.0 is burned into ROM, and actually seeing it on my dealer's
$shelves (so to speak)?

Please follow-up in comp.sys.amiga.misc.

Note: We're shipping completed 2.0 documentation with the A3000.

	Paul.

dave@unislc.uucp (Dave Martin) (01/26/91)

From article <17770@cbmvax.commodore.com>, by higgin@cbmvax.commodore.com (Paul Higginbottom - CATS):
> In article <50784@sequent.UUCP> cseaman@sequent.UUCP (Chris "The Bartman" Seaman) writes:
> $This leads to the following question.  Given that the feature list for
> $2.0 is (or should be) frozen, and the current revisions are bug fixes,
> $is there any likelyhood that Commodore has already taken steps such as
> $finalizing documentation, packaging, etc.?  I know this sounds like the
> 
> Note: We're shipping completed 2.0 documentation with the A3000.
> 
> 	Paul.

Yes, but when will the 2.0 RKMs be available?

-- 
VAX Headroom	Speaking for myself only... blah blah blahblah blah...
Internet: DMARTIN@CC.WEBER.EDU                 dave@saltlcy-unisys.army.mil
uucp:     dave@unislc.uucp or use the Path: line.
Now was that civilized?  No, clearly not.  Fun, but in no sense civilized.