peter@sugar.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva) (01/28/91)
In article <1889eb6d.ARN09885@prolix.ccadfa.oz.au> ccadfa.cc.adfa.oz.au!prolix!Dac writes: > [I have to pay $A1000 if I want EMAIL access to the net, and I cannot afford > that, since I'm just an individual, not a corporation!] To Dac, and other users with no Email access: If you don't have Email access, please include another way to get hold of you in your .signature. A telephone number, postal address, etcetera would be useful. Also, there are commercial Email services with lower up-front fees: I believe MCI Mail was planning some sort of service in Australia last time I had anything to do with them. -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' <peter@sugar.hackercorp.com>.
dac@prolix.ccadfa.oz.au (Andrew Clayton) (01/28/91)
In article <7627@sugar.hackercorp.com>, Peter da Silva writes: > In article <1889eb6d.ARN09885@prolix.ccadfa.oz.au> ccadfa.cc.adfa.oz.au!prolix!Dac writes: > > [I have to pay $A1000 if I want EMAIL access to the net, and I cannot afford > > that, since I'm just an individual, not a corporation!] > To Dac, and other users with no Email access: > If you don't have Email access, please include another way to get hold of you > in your .signature. A telephone number, postal address, etcetera would be Thanks for your concern, Peter. I'm in the process of fixing that oversight, and getting a mail account via somewhere in Sydney (for a much reduced cost). I once said that mail was unimportant. I didn't know enough about the net to realise the depth of my innaccuracy. :-/ Until then, my return address (as above) IS a valid mail address. I'd rather not get mail though, because I CANNOT reply. Yet. When this changes, my siggie will inform the world! :^) Dac -- _l _ _ // Andrew Clayton. Canberra, Australia. I Post . (_](_l(_ \X/ ccadfa.cc.adfa.oz.au!prolix!dac . . I am. -------- I cannot send or receive email. Not to anyone at all. Not even you.