[comp.sys.amiga.misc] IconX vs. IconJ??

yorkw@stable.ecn.purdue.edu (Willis F York) (02/11/91)

dcoteles@Bonnie.ICS.UCI.EDU writes:
>	What does IconJ do that Icon X can't do.  Should an average
>"Joe Six-Pack" use it?  If you should, how do you use in place of IconX?

Well from the IconJ Docs, it says That iconJ is "better" because it
supports Arexx better, and has some "other" bugs of IconX fixed.

Somthing about being able to get user input with IconJ that ya can't do with
IconX.

I just use it to run Arexx scripts from WB..
(I just replaced IconX with IconJ -> renamed to IconX.

--
yorkw@ecn.purdue.edu  Willis F York says:   
 IF ya meat an Amiga Owner that says: "I got my amiga Just to play games...:
there's only one thing to do...
Give him a Boot to the head... Then repeat .... Then repeat...