fillg1@uni-paderborn.de (Michael Illgner) (04/03/91)
Hi folks, I am switching to KS and WB 2.0, but I want to use my favorite tools like the famouse WShell, MachIII, ARP etc. The WShell seems to work, but the resident list ist not recognized, all commands are loaded from the disk again. Should I use the Commodore resident command ? Can program launched from WorkBench use the resident list too ? MachIII works too, but SetMach could not open its screen, I got a message like 'not enough memory' (I do not remember the exact words) Which C: commands are better, ARP or Commodore 2.0 ? Michael -- Michael Illgner fillg1@uni-paderborn.de Tel. Theodorstrasse 27 Warburger Strasse 100 Buero 05251/60-2331 4790 Paderborn Theoretische Physik Privat 05251/26488 Germany Buero : N3.323
blgardne@javelin.sim.es.com (Blaine Gardner) (04/04/91)
fillg1@uni-paderborn.de (Michael Illgner) writes: >Hi folks, >I am switching to KS and WB 2.0, but I want to use my favorite tools like >the famouse WShell, MachIII, ARP etc. >The WShell seems to work, but the resident list ist not recognized, >all commands are loaded from the disk again. Should I use the Commodore >resident command ? Can program launched from WorkBench use the resident list >too ? Bill is working on a completely new upgrade of WShell for 2.0, but until that sees the light of day, he's provided a couple of small updates to make WShell more 2.0 compatible, including use of the 2.0 internal DOS commands. I think they are available on most of the commercial systems like BIX and PLink, and also in the archives at ab20. -- Blaine Gardner @ Evans & Sutherland 580 Arapeen Drive, SLC, Utah 84108 blgardne@javelin.sim.es.com or ...dsd.es.com!javelin!blgardne DoD #0046 My other motorcycle is a Quadracer. BIX: blaine_g 28 miles to go....
po87553@korppi.tut.fi (Pasi 'Albert' Ojala) (04/05/91)
In article <1991Apr3.112854.576@uni-paderborn.de> fillg1@uni-paderborn.de (Michael Illgner) writes: > >Hi folks, Hi :) >like 'not enough memory' (I do not remember the exact words) > >Which C: commands are better, ARP or Commodore 2.0 ? > I prefer ARP commands but for some strange reason they don't work under Kickstart 2.0. A couple days ago I heard of ARP 1.4 which would work under 2.0 too, but I couldn't find it anywhere. (The rumour was spearded in a local BBS). Does anyone know where to find ARP 1.4? It's not it ab20.larc.nasa.gov... > > Michael >-- >Michael Illgner fillg1@uni-paderborn.de Tel. >Theodorstrasse 27 Warburger Strasse 100 Buero 05251/60-2331 >4790 Paderborn Theoretische Physik Privat 05251/26488 >Germany Buero : N3.323 <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Pasi Ojala Pasbox v2.6 Why does my signature keep changing?? po87553@tut.fi C64 forever Am I doing something wrong? <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
blgardne@javelin.sim.es.com (Blaine Gardner) (04/05/91)
po87553@korppi.tut.fi (Pasi 'Albert' Ojala) writes: >I prefer ARP commands but for some strange reason they don't work >under Kickstart 2.0. A couple days ago I heard of ARP 1.4 which There is no ARP 1.4, 1.3 is still the most recent version. The only ARP commands I'm running under 2.0 are "List" (for the sort option), and "Mount" (required by TAPE:, and renamed to ARPmount). But they do run just fine under 2.0, have you copied the arp.library to your libs: dir? -- Blaine Gardner @ Evans & Sutherland 580 Arapeen Drive, SLC, Utah 84108 blgardne@javelin.sim.es.com or ...dsd.es.com!javelin!blgardne DoD #46 My other motorcycle is a Quadracer. BIX: blaine_g But this one is an FJ1200 -> "Engage!" (with a nod to hazy)