[comp.unix.amiga] Why are there both of these groups

Anthon_Pang@mindlink.UUCP (Anthon Pang) (02/13/91)

rodmur@ecst.csuchico.edu (Dale A. Harris) writes:
> If I may be so bold to ask why is there both comp.sys.amiga.unix and
> comp.unix
> .amiga, isn't it a little redundant to have both of them?

comp.sys.amiga.unix is one of the bogus newsgroups that was created when
someone jumped the proverbial gun (group reorganization process).

comp.unix.amiga is the legitimate group.

In fact, you probably still have comp.sys.amiga.software.pirates...right?
It's about time, someone send out the appropriate control messages, and remove
these bogus groups.

rodmur@ecst.csuchico.edu (Dale A. Harris) (02/14/91)

If I may be so bold to ask why is there both comp.sys.amiga.unix and comp.unix
.amiga, isn't it a little redundant to have both of them?


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dale A. Harris          Chaotically Yours, 
rodmur@ecst.csuchico.edu  __     __   _    ,
{Internet}               /  )   /  ) ' )  /
                        /  /   /--/   /--/
                       /__/ o /  ( o /  ( o
"Honk, if you have seen Elvis or Saddam Hussein's Air Force" bumper sticker