keith@ca.excelan.com (Keith Brown) (03/06/91)
The News Manager) Nntp-Posting-Host: ca Reply-To: keith@ca.excelan.com (Keith Brown) Organization: Novell, Inc. San Jose, California References: <6434@ncrwic.Wichita.NCR.COM> <1991Feb21.144302.18780@cimage.com> <1991Feb21.234900.11916@novell.com> <kusumoto.667459123@chsun1> Distribution: usa Date: Tue, 26 Feb 1991 20:26:02 GMT In article <kusumoto.667459123@chsun1> kusumoto@chsun1.uchicago.edu (Bob Kusumoto) writes: > >Ok, I think I know that we're going to get (for free I assume), NW v3.11, >the 250 user version, Correct! > with the 100 user version of the Mac v3.0 NLM. Also correct. > I guess you'd throw in Btreive, Nope. No Btreive.... We are however including Btrieve :-) Everything you need to install, configure and run Btrieve binaries is in the base operating system (including the Btrieve NLMs, the DOS Btrieve requestor and the new DLL for getting at Btrieve calls from Windows 3.0 apps). If you actually want to write code to the Btrieve APIs however, you will need a seperate toolkit that shows you how. > OS/2 requestor, MHS, NNS Nope. Still separate. MHS is no longer included with the OS and NetWare Name Services is standalone product. NNS is not v3.11 specific and can be used in conjunction with 286 servers. > and TCP/IP support is built into the new version. Yep. My favorite NLMs are bundled into v3.11. > Are we getting anything else? Is some of >this stuff I mentioned not given for free? Offhand, I can think of two things worth mentioning. The Remote Management Facility is in there along with the new backup NLM's (SBACKUP). > >I know that we're not getting NFS NLM for free. What about the other >announced stuff? What aren't we getting so we can try and figure out >what we have to pay for? > NetWare NFS, NetWare FTAM, NetWare Communication Services, NetWare SQL, er.... Keith - Keith Brown Phone: (408) 473 8308 Novell San Jose Development Centre Fax: (408) 433 0775 2180 Fortune Dr, San Jose, California 95131 Net: keith@novell.COM
brian@cimage.com (Brian Kelley) (03/12/91)
In article <1991Feb26.202602.17118@novell.com> keith@ca.excelan.com (Keith Brown) writes: >In article <kusumoto.667459123@chsun1> kusumoto@chsun1.uchicago.edu (Bob Kusumoto) writes: >> and TCP/IP support is built into the new version. > >Yep. My favorite NLMs are bundled into v3.11. Favorite NLMs? Does this mean that the NLM for Netware 3.1 which removed the console message "Novell In-House version" is included with the new release? That would be great! Sorry, I couldn't help myself. :-) >Keith Brown Phone: (408) 473 8308 >Novell San Jose Development Centre Fax: (408) 433 0775 >2180 Fortune Dr, San Jose, California 95131 Net: keith@novell.COM --- brian@cimage.com
Jons@cup.portal.com (Jonathan S Spangler) (03/15/91)
>In article <1991Feb26.202602.17118@novell.com> keith@ca.excelan.com (Keith Bro w >n) writes: >>In article <kusumoto.667459123@chsun1> kusumoto@chsun1.uchicago.edu (Bob Kusu m >oto) writes: > >>> and TCP/IP support is built into the new version. >> >>Yep. My favorite NLMs are bundled into v3.11. > >Favorite NLMs? Does this mean that the NLM for Netware 3.1 which removed >the console message "Novell In-House version" is included with the new >release? That would be great! >--- >brian@cimage.com Brian, I don't think that the patch for the name is an NLM. Rather, it is a direct patch of SERVER.EX -- a static patch at that. If the patch *were* an NLM, we could load and unload it at will. This is what Novell calls a dynamic patch. Aloha, Jonathan Spangler (jons@cup.portal.com)