schoen2@husc9.harvard.edu (Michael Schoen) (04/08/91)
Hi there. I will soon be implementing a Novell network for PCs and Macs. I had been planning to use SFT, because there was no support for Macs on 386. But in v. 3.11 (I believe) an NLM for Macs was introduced. My network consultant has cautioned me, however, that it may be buggy. Does anyone have any experience with it yet? How does it compare to the Mac support in SFT? Thanks. schoen2@husc9.harvard.edu
timm@sed.novell.com (Tim Myers) (04/10/91)
In article <1991Apr7.200336.451@husc3.harvard.edu> schoen2@husc9.harvard.edu (Michael Schoen) writes: > Hi there. I will soon be implementing a Novell network for > PCs and Macs. I had been planning to use SFT, because there > was no support for Macs on 386. But in v. 3.11 (I believe) > an NLM for Macs was introduced. My network consultant has > cautioned me, however, that it may be buggy. Does anyone have > any experience with it yet? How does it compare to the Mac > support in SFT? I have used NetWare v3.11 and the NetWare for Macintosh v3.0 NLMs for several months now. Compared to previous versions, it is faster and offers more Mac support including AppleTalk routing, AppleTalk phase II, and AFP 2.0. This is the most reliable version of NetWare for Macintosh we have released. ++Tim ========================================= Tim Myers Senior Software Consultant Novell, Inc. "Macintosh: the only GUI that doesn't SUCK."