[comp.lang.clos] Error in earlier post

sticklen@pleiades.cps.msu.edu (Jon Sticklen) (11/19/90)

in an earlier post here, i wrote... 

|> the result is that in CLOS there is a lot more flexibity/power, but
|> in LOOPS (and other languages of the same ilk) there is a strong
|> sense of a object centered programming paradigm. so the trade off is
|> more power for a harder to manage (and esp to learn) programming world
|> view.            ^^^^^^


well... i did not mean harder. i meant easier. in the heat of
trying to suggest that the programming world view of CLOS
is not as easy to use as the world view of LOOPS (and others like it)
i said it exactly backwards.

the trade off is more power (CLOS view) with easier to use (LOOPS
view), at least in my estimation.

	---jon---