[comp.benchmarks] More mini-bechmark results

xxdon@monet.lerc.nasa.gov (Don Sosoka) (12/03/90)

Fow what it's worth here's a few more on the mini-benchmark...

Vendor       Model          User      Real
SGI          4D25           8.1        8.4
SGI          320 (2 cpu)    5.2        5.2
SGI          340 (4 cpu)    5.2        5.2
SGI          3030          37.8       39.4
CRAY         XMP4/8         7.8       20.7
CRAY         YMP4/64        5.9       13.9
CONVEX       C220           9.4       10.4
IBM          RS6000/530     3.5        3.5  <--- repeatedly!
AMDAHL       5870 (UTS)     4.3       17.6

toyama@ae.keio.ac.jp (Motomichi Toyama) (12/04/90)

Fujitsu M780/10 UTS

toyama@M780(UTS) 11: echo 2^5000/2^5000 | /bin/time bc
19038: echo: Exit status 0
1

real        1.9
user        1.8
sys         0.0

# mainframe unix still have place to live?
--
Motomichi Toyama (toyama@ae.keio.ac.jp) / Keio University, Yokohama Japan

NEUMANN@awiwuw11.wu-wien.ac.at (Gustaf Neumann) (12/11/90)

>>>>>>>>>>>> bc hit parade <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< so far >>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The bc-test
     echo 2^5000/2^5000 | /bin/time bc
leads to following results (user time):

machine                            reported by
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fujitsu M780/10 UTS           1.8  toyama@ae.keio.ac.jp
MIPS RC6280                   2.8  kmk@assari.tut.fi
Alliant FX/2800 (28x i860)    3.5  turner@sp64.csrd.uiuc.edu
IBM RS/6000 720               3.5  tif@doorstop.austin.ibm.com
IBM RS/6000 530               3.5  xxdon@monet.lerc.nasa.gov
AMDAHL 5870 (UTS)             4.3  xxdon@monet.lerc.nasa.gov
IBM RS/6000 320               4.4  de5@ornl.gov
Silicon Graphics 4D/380SX     5.2  kmk@assari.tut.fi
SGI 320 (2 cpu)               5.2  xxdon@monet.lerc.nasa.gov
SGI 340 (4 cpu)               5.2  xxdon@monet.lerc.nasa.gov
HP9000/870                    5.5  dvl@hpcupt1.cup.hp.com
Stardent 3000                 5.8  kmk@assari.tut.fi
Cray Y/MP 2/64                5.9  dwf@lanl.gov
Cray Y/MP 4/64                5.9  xxdon@monet.lerc.nasa.gov
DECstation 5000/200 (U 4.0)   6.0  neumann@awiwuw11.bitnet
MIPS RC3280                   6.0  kmk@assari.tut.fi
MIPS M/2000                   6.0  zdenko@katzo.rice.edu
DECsystem 5810                6.2  de5@ornl.gov
Sparcstation 2GX              7.0  dwf@hope.lanl.gov
Cray X/MP 4/8                 7.8  xxdon@monet.lerc.nasa.gov
DG 88K 25MHz                  8.0  philip@beeblebrox.dle.dg.com
SGI 4D/25                     8.1  xxdon@monet.lerc.nasa.gov
Sun 4/470 (sos 4.1)           8.3  casper@fwi.uva.nl
Cray X/MP (Unicos)            8.6  de5@ornl.gov
Convex C220                   9.4  xxdon@monet.lerc.nasa.gov
Compaq 486/25 ISC 2.2         9.1  suitti@ima.isc.com
DECstation3100 (U 4.0)        9.4  neumann@awiwuw11.bitnet
HP9000/375 (HP-UX 7.0)        9.4  wunder@orac.HP.COM
Convex C220                   9.5  dwf@lanl.gov
DECstation3100 (U 3.1)        9.6  neumann@awiwuw11.bitnet
MIPS RS2030                  10.0  zdenko@katzo.rice.edu
Sun 4/370 (sos 4.1)          11.2  casper@fwi.uva.nl
SPARCstation 1+ (sos 4.1)    12.0  casper@fwi.uva.nl
Compaq 386/33 ISC 2.2        12.1  suitti@ima.isc.com
DECstation 2100              12.6  meissner@osf.org
SGI 4D/20                    13.1  buck@drax.gsfc.nasa.gov
SLC (sos 4.1)                15.1  casper@fwi.uva.nl
Sparcstation 1               15.2  juan@burdell.gatech.edu
Compaq 386/25 ISC 2.2        16.1  suitti@ima.isc.com
HP9000/835 (HP-UX 7.0)       18.0  neumann@awiwuw11.bitnet
NeXT 68030 (Mach 1.0)        18.8  castor@fizzle.stanford.edu
MicroVAX 3200                20.5  crispin@csd.uwo.ca
Sequent S27                  26.7  crispin@csd.uwo.ca
Sun 3/80 (sos 4.1)           28.6  casper@fwi.uva.nl
Sun 3/60 (sos 4.1)           29.9  casper@fwi.uva.nl
SGI 3030                     37.8  xxdon@monet.lerc.nasa.gov
Sun 3/110                    39.3  crispin@csd.uwo.ca
Sun 3/50                     42.9  crispin@csd.uwo.ca
Sun 3/50                     43.4  zeeff@b-tech.ann-arbor.mi.us
80286 (Xenix)                45.1  ethan@thinc.UUCP
Zenith 386/20 ISC 2.2        84.6  suitti@ima.isc.com


Comments about the comparability of the results above by amos@taux01.nsc.com:
> "bc" is probably the worst choice of a utility to benchmark by.  On most
> UNIX systems, it just parses expressions, and forks "dc" to execute them
> ("dc" is a reverse-polish string based numeric interpreter).  So the
> results depend on how fast your system forks, and how "bc" and "dc"
> communicate.
>
> Besides, there are several versions of "bc" (some of which do not fork "dc")
> and since the original version of "dc" was rather buggy, several versions
> of it too, some of which are major rewrites.
>
> The bottom line is: comparing "bc" runs on different systems is necessarily
> comparing apples and oranges (or at least plums & prunes) unless you're
> sure you have the same version of "bc", "dc", and UNIX.  Results posted
> here so far indicate most comparisons are indeed meaningless.


Remarks in favour of this test:
 -  simple test, easy to remember, no effort involved to run it
 -  unpredicted benchmark, unlikely that a vendor has an optimized bc
    or a compiler that generates especially fast code for bc.


-gustaf
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Gustaf Neumann       neumann@dec4.wu-wien.ac.at, neumann@awiwuw11.bitnet
Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration
Augasse 2-6,  A-1090 Vienna, Austria
Tel: +43 (222) 31-336 x4533     Fax 347-555